Fijian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 54,688,537 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.040% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to a decrease of 40.1 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,187 compared to $117,750, a difference of 38.2%), median family income ($87,387 compared to $119,800, a difference of 37.1%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $109,520, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $57,078, a difference of 13.9%), wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 17.8%), and median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $43,648, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 49.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 46.7%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 46.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 10.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 37.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (6.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (3.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.42%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 11.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.1%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (77.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.1%), single mother households (7.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 36.3%), and births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 15.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.080%), average family size (3.36 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.4%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.040%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 105.7%), professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 85.9%), and master's degree (10.3% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 67.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.69%), nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%), and kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.70%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 34.4%), disability age 65 to 74 (27.0% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 25.6%), and vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 21.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.9%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.2%), and cognitive disability (17.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.8%).