Argentinean vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 278,628,169 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Argentinean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.077. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Argentineans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Argentineans corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,246 compared to $72,288, a difference of 10.8%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($110,103 compared to $117,750, a difference of 6.9%), and median household income ($93,960 compared to $100,151, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.020%), per capita income ($49,862 compared to $49,894, a difference of 0.070%), and median male earnings ($60,117 compared to $61,759, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 26.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 25.2%), and married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 0.97%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.5%), and single mother poverty (27.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.7%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.0% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 9.4%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.54%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 9.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.43%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.7%), births to unmarried women (30.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 7.6%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.71%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 26.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 15.2%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 8.9%), and master's degree (18.2% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Argentinean and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%), male disability (10.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 8.2%), and disability age 18 to 34 (5.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 7.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.20%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.7%).