Portuguese vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,603,365 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.211. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.097% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to a decrease of 97.4 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $72,288, a difference of 17.7%), median family income ($106,286 compared to $119,800, a difference of 12.7%), and median household income ($88,976 compared to $100,151, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 1.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $57,078, a difference of 4.9%), and median female earnings ($40,177 compared to $43,648, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.2% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 32.2%), child poverty under the age of 5 (16.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 23.7%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (15.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.3%), and male poverty (10.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 11.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 29.2%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 3.4%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.4% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.45%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.47%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.2%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 21.3%), single mother households (6.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 20.9%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 17.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.3%), 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.20%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.77%), and no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 32.6%), and master's degree (13.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 23.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 25.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.0%), cognitive disability (16.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 7.8%).