Alaskan Athabascan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 44,755,937 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Alaskan Athabascan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.329. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Alaskan Athabascans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Alaskan Athabascans corresponds to a decrease of 10.1 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($76,383 compared to $100,151, a difference of 31.1%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($90,951 compared to $117,750, a difference of 29.5%), and per capita income ($39,163 compared to $49,894, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.7%), householder income under 25 years ($51,713 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.4%), and median female earnings ($37,905 compared to $43,648, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in female poverty among 25-34 year olds (19.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 66.9%), child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.4%), and receiving food stamps (14.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 59.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 13.6%), single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 18.1%), and single father poverty (18.1% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (8.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 103.9%), male unemployment (9.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 98.3%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (8.6% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 98.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 5.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (45.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 24.6%), in labor force | age 20-24 (79.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.9%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (76.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.0%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 59.7%), single mother households (7.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 38.5%), and births to unmarried women (37.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.27 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.47%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.0%), and family households (61.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 6.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 79.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (86.0% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (11.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 48.6%), bachelor's degree (28.8% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 48.0%), and professional degree (3.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 43.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 11th grade (93.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 0.090%), high school diploma (90.9% compared to 91.2%, a difference of 0.34%), and nursery school (98.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.56%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Alaskan Athabascan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (5.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 66.0%), vision disability (3.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 60.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (15.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 59.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.2%), cognitive disability (17.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 6.2%), and disability age over 75 (54.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 14.6%).