Immigrants from England vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 355,353,224 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from England communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.047. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from England within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.019% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from England corresponds to an increase of 19.5 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,817 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.2%), householder income over 65 years ($65,715 compared to $72,288, a difference of 10.0%), and median household income ($92,098 compared to $100,151, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($48,844 compared to $49,894, a difference of 2.1%), wage/income gap (27.9% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and median male earnings ($59,527 compared to $61,759, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (16.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 21.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (15.1% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.8% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 4.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 5.5%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 15.3%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.5%), and female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.2% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.0%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.2% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.33%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (31.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.4%), single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.6%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.3% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.63%), family households with children (26.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 16.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.070%), no vehicles in household (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (58.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 5.2%), no schooling completed (1.7% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 4.9%), and associate's degree (49.7% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.9% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.030%), nursery school (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%), and kindergarten (98.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from England and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 16.9%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.2%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.0% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 11.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.15%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.2%), and disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 2.5%).