Immigrants vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,176,909 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.075. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants corresponds to a decrease of 1.4 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($59,656 compared to $72,288, a difference of 21.2%), median family income ($100,962 compared to $119,800, a difference of 18.7%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($99,943 compared to $117,750, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($53,201 compared to $57,078, a difference of 7.3%), wage/income gap (25.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.4%), and median female earnings ($39,328 compared to $43,648, a difference of 11.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 47.2%), family poverty (10.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 41.5%), and receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 41.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 5.9%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.2%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.8%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 16.4%), and female unemployment (5.7% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.6% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 6.7%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.0% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 8.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.0%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 29.7%), births to unmarried women (32.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.2%), and single father households (2.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 16.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.44%), average family size (3.33 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.5%), and divorced or separated (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 33.8%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 15.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.1%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 54.9%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 27.0%), and professional degree (4.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 24.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 13.0%), vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.5%), and disability age 65 to 74 (23.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.37%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.85%), and disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 1.2%).