Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Chile
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Chile

Bhutanese

Good
Exceptional
6,902
SOCIAL INDEX
66.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
137th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from Chile Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,347,345 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Chile communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.392. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Chile within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.180% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Chile corresponds to an increase of 180.3 Bhutanese.
Immigrants from Chile Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($62,354 compared to $72,288, a difference of 15.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,412 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.9%), and median family income ($105,655 compared to $119,800, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 4.9%), per capita income ($46,213 compared to $49,894, a difference of 8.0%), and median female earnings ($40,353 compared to $43,648, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$46,213
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Excellent
$105,655
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Excellent
$88,388
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Excellent
$47,697
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Excellent
$55,954
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Good
$40,353
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Good
$52,440
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Excellent
$97,159
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Excellent
$103,412
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,354
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Average
25.7%
Tragic
27.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 29.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 26.5%), and family poverty (8.9% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 4.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.7%), and single male poverty (12.1% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 9.1%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
Poverty
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Average
8.9%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Average
11.1%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Average
13.3%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Excellent
13.1%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Excellent
16.4%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Good
15.7%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Good
15.9%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.1%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
20.1%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.7%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
28.4%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Fair
5.3%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
11.7%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
13.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 11.0%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.1% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 10.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.4%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
Unemployment
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Average
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
18.1%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Excellent
6.5%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Good
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Excellent
5.1%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.8%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
7.3%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Good
8.9%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.8% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.9% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.070%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.12%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
65.9%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.8%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Excellent
84.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Excellent
85.0%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.5%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 18.5%), births to unmarried women (31.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 11.9%), and divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.41%), family households with children (27.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.3%), and family households (64.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.0%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
Family Households
Good
64.6%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Good
27.7%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.5%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Good
3.24
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Average
6.3%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Fair
46.4%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Fair
12.1%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Good
31.2%
Exceptional
27.9%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 28.5%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 18.2%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Poor
11.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Poor
89.1%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.2%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Poor
18.8%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Poor
6.1%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.2% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 20.9%), doctorate degree (2.1% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.3%), and college, under 1 year (66.8% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 5.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Fair
2.2%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Poor
97.9%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Poor
97.8%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Poor
97.7%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Poor
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Poor
97.4%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Poor
97.2%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Poor
96.8%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Poor
93.4%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.1%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Fair
88.9%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Average
85.9%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.8%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.4%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
49.0%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
40.8%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
16.8%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.1%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Chile and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 14.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.16%), female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.21%), and self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.67%).
Immigrants from Chile vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from ChileBhutanese
Disability
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.6%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.5%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.4%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.1%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.1%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
22.1%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.5%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Excellent
2.1%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.8%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.4%
Exceptional
2.4%