German Russian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,296,832 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within German Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.222. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in German Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.041% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 German Russians corresponds to an increase of 41.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($75,856 compared to $100,151, a difference of 32.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($89,398 compared to $117,750, a difference of 31.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($55,356 compared to $72,288, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.6%), median female earnings ($37,105 compared to $43,648, a difference of 17.6%), and median earnings ($43,200 compared to $52,297, a difference of 21.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (18.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 40.6%), child poverty among girls under 16 (17.8% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 39.6%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (17.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 38.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.3% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 16.0%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.0% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.3%), and single father poverty (17.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 18.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.3%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.16%), female unemployment (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.57%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.1% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.90%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (42.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 16.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.32%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 26.2%), births to unmarried women (33.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.8%), average family size (3.15 compared to 3.25, a difference of 3.3%), and currently married (45.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (4.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 37.0%), doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.0%), and master's degree (13.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 27.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.0%), 2nd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%), and 3rd grade (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between German Russian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 39.2%), disability age 35 to 64 (12.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 26.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 19.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.41%), hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.9%).