Immigrants from El Salvador vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 323,843,527 people shows a significant negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from El Salvador communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.615. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from El Salvador within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.026% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from El Salvador corresponds to a decrease of 26.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($38,394 compared to $49,894, a difference of 29.9%), median family income ($92,545 compared to $119,800, a difference of 29.4%), and median male earnings ($47,973 compared to $61,759, a difference of 28.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($54,599 compared to $57,078, a difference of 4.5%), wage/income gap (22.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 18.4%), and median female earnings ($36,673 compared to $43,648, a difference of 19.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 65.2%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.7% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 57.1%), and family poverty (11.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 0.060%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.3% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.0%), and single male poverty (12.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 13.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.4%), female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 8.6%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 11.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.8%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.9% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.19%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.96%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.6% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 44.4%), single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 39.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and average family size (3.49 compared to 3.25, a difference of 7.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.6%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.91%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 3.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.9% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 115.3%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 60.3%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.1%), kindergarten (96.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and 1st grade (96.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from El Salvador and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.3%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 16.6%), and vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.41%), female disability (11.4% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.55%), and disability (10.9% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.3%).