Immigrants from Central America vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 443,570,745 people shows a strong negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Central America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.785. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Central America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Central America corresponds to a decrease of 13.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($34,974 compared to $49,894, a difference of 42.7%), median family income ($85,050 compared to $119,800, a difference of 40.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,965 compared to $117,750, a difference of 37.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,022 compared to $57,078, a difference of 11.9%), and median female earnings ($33,953 compared to $43,648, a difference of 28.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 81.4%), family poverty (12.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 71.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (21.3% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.0% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 7.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 11.0%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 30.7%), and female unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 7.0%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 10.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 12.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.60%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.1% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 42.0%), and births to unmarried women (37.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (68.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.7%), average family size (3.49 compared to 3.25, a difference of 7.5%), and married-couple households (45.7% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 7.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 5.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.26%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.82%), and no vehicles in household (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 100.7%), doctorate degree (1.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 95.7%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 89.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Central America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.5% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (26.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 24.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.3% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 3.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.3%).