Jordanian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 160,554,622 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Jordanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Jordanians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Jordanians corresponds to a decrease of 11.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,313 compared to $72,288, a difference of 12.4%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,186 compared to $109,520, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income under 25 years ($51,796 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.8% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.70%), median female earnings ($41,464 compared to $43,648, a difference of 5.3%), and median earnings ($49,632 compared to $52,297, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (15.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 19.7%), child poverty under the age of 16 (14.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 18.5%), and married-couple family poverty (4.8% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 17.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.6% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 2.2%), single mother poverty (26.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 3.1%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.1% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 11.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.22%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.70%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.34%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (85.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.020%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.14%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 12.8%), family households with children (29.0% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and single father households (2.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.19%), family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.47%), and currently married (48.0% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 18.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.060%), no vehicles in household (8.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 15.8%), professional degree (4.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.7%), and no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Jordanian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.2%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.88%), cognitive disability (16.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 1.3%), and female disability (11.3% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 2.0%).