Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Latin America
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Latin America

Bhutanese

Poor
Exceptional
1,392
SOCIAL INDEX
11.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
311th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from Latin America Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 451,434,195 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Latin America communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.815. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latin America within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.011% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latin America corresponds to a decrease of 10.9 Bhutanese.
Immigrants from Latin America Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($86,989 compared to $119,800, a difference of 37.7%), householder income over 65 years ($53,265 compared to $72,288, a difference of 35.7%), and per capita income ($36,823 compared to $49,894, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,387 compared to $57,078, a difference of 11.1%), wage/income gap (23.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.7%), and median female earnings ($35,307 compared to $43,648, a difference of 23.6%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$36,823
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Tragic
$86,989
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Tragic
$75,420
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Tragic
$41,049
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$46,941
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$35,307
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,387
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,166
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$87,219
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$53,265
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
23.7%
Tragic
27.0%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 75.8%), receiving food stamps (15.7% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 70.1%), and family poverty (11.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 67.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.5%), single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 9.5%), and single male poverty (13.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 22.1%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
Poverty
Tragic
15.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Tragic
11.8%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Tragic
16.4%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Excellent
19.7%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
16.0%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
21.2%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
20.5%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
20.6%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Tragic
13.5%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Tragic
23.7%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Fair
16.4%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Tragic
32.4%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Tragic
7.2%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Tragic
14.2%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
15.6%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
15.7%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 28.5%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 27.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (11.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 9.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 11.3%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 13.0%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
Unemployment
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Tragic
12.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Tragic
19.4%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Tragic
11.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Tragic
7.4%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Tragic
6.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Tragic
5.0%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Tragic
5.3%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.6%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Tragic
9.6%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
6.4%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (33.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 45-54 (81.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (78.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 2.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.97%), in labor force | age 20-24 (74.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Poor
64.8%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Tragic
78.3%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
33.9%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
74.1%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Tragic
82.9%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
83.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
82.8%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
81.0%
Exceptional
83.5%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 49.8%), births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 33.3%), and single father households (2.8% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 32.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (67.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.1%), average family size (3.42 compared to 3.25, a difference of 5.4%), and family households with children (29.7% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
Family Households
Exceptional
67.2%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.7%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
44.7%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.42
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.8%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.9%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.8%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
37.1%
Exceptional
27.9%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 18.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 9.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 8.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.8%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Average
10.4%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.8%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Poor
54.3%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
20.5%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.1%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 82.6%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 78.1%), and professional degree (3.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 64.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), kindergarten (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.6%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
95.7%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
94.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
91.7%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Tragic
90.4%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Tragic
88.3%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Tragic
86.8%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
85.0%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Tragic
82.1%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
78.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
56.3%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
50.7%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
37.9%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
30.1%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Tragic
11.3%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.3%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.3%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latin America and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 23.9%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.55%), male disability (11.2% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and disability (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.0%).
Immigrants from Latin America vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Latin AmericaBhutanese
Disability
Average
11.7%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Average
11.2%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Average
12.2%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Fair
5.6%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Fair
11.5%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.6%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.5%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Tragic
2.4%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.6%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Poor
6.3%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.7%
Exceptional
2.4%