Immigrants from Czechoslovakia vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 187,133,154 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Czechoslovakia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.362. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Czechoslovakia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 1.024% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Czechoslovakia corresponds to an increase of 1,024.1 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($66,376 compared to $72,288, a difference of 8.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,914 compared to $117,750, a difference of 5.2%), and median household income ($95,319 compared to $100,151, a difference of 5.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median earnings ($52,361 compared to $52,297, a difference of 0.12%), median female earnings ($43,571 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.18%), and median male earnings ($62,217 compared to $61,759, a difference of 0.74%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (14.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 14.1%), married-couple family poverty (4.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (13.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 11.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (9.6% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 4.6%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.1% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and female poverty (11.9% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.0%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.8% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 8.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 0.94%), female unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.2%), and unemployment (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.77%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.4% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.70%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.16%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (79.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.41%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.6%), family households with children (26.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.4% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.58%), single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.84%), and births to unmarried women (28.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.2%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 35.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 20.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (18.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 7.9%), professional degree (5.8% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 7.0%), and bachelor's degree (44.0% compared to 42.7%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4th grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.0%), and nursery school (98.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Czechoslovakia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 5 to 17 (5.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 6.3%), disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 4.4%), and hearing disability (3.1% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.010%), male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.60%), and female disability (11.6% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.80%).