Latvian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,239,014 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Latvian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Latvians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.186% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Latvians corresponds to an increase of 185.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($52,783 compared to $57,078, a difference of 8.1%), householder income over 65 years ($67,326 compared to $72,288, a difference of 7.4%), and per capita income ($52,649 compared to $49,894, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median family income ($120,301 compared to $119,800, a difference of 0.42%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,926 compared to $109,520, a difference of 0.55%), and median female earnings ($43,941 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.67%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 14.4%), single father poverty (16.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 10.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 8.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family poverty (7.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.44%), receiving food stamps (9.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and male poverty (9.6% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 6.8%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 6.6%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.9% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.38%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.47%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.85%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.1%), in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (86.0% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.080%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.34%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.36%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.4%), family households (62.8% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.9%), and average family size (3.11 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (5.3% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 0.12%), currently married (48.5% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and births to unmarried women (27.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 27.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 15.4%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 5.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 16.8%), master's degree (19.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 15.3%), and professional degree (6.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), kindergarten (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.29%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Latvian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 12.1%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.4% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 10.3%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 9.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 0.23%), ambulatory disability (5.7% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.23%), and cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.44%).