Immigrants from Guatemala vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 337,679,961 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Guatemala communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.289. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Guatemala within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.015% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Guatemala corresponds to a decrease of 14.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($87,191 compared to $119,800, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,573 compared to $117,750, a difference of 36.0%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($81,341 compared to $109,520, a difference of 34.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,447 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.9%), wage/income gap (22.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 20.2%), and median female earnings ($35,444 compared to $43,648, a difference of 23.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 75.5%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 72.5%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.9% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 71.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.0%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.9% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.7%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 28.8%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.9%), and female unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 4.9%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 7.5%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.27%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 46.5%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 41.6%), and births to unmarried women (37.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.0% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.41 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.9%), and family households with children (28.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 28.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (53.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 10.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 98.6%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 67.1%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 58.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), kindergarten (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and 1st grade (96.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Guatemala and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 20.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.7% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 19.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 1.1%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%).