Immigrants from Ghana vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 188,725,877 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Ghana communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.057. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Ghana within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Ghana corresponds to a decrease of 6.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($87,760 compared to $109,520, a difference of 24.8%), median family income ($96,544 compared to $119,800, a difference of 24.1%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,982 compared to $117,750, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($39,894 compared to $43,648, a difference of 9.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,333 compared to $57,078, a difference of 11.2%), and median earnings ($45,641 compared to $52,297, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (19.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 54.0%), family poverty (10.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 53.9%), and receiving food stamps (14.1% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 53.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.5% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother poverty (29.9% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 25.0%), male unemployment (6.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 24.5%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 24.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.4%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 12.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.5%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.5%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.010%), in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.24%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 51.3%), births to unmarried women (34.5% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 23.8%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.9%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 90.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 50.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (47.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 24.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.2% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 37.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 44.7%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 33.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.85%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.86%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.86%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Ghana and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 24.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 20.2%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 20.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (10.9% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.69%), disability age over 75 (47.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.1%).