Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Malaysia
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Bhutanese
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Malaysia

Bhutanese

Good
Exceptional
7,792
SOCIAL INDEX
75.4/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
105th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Bhutanese Integration in Immigrants from Malaysia Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 191,986,733 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Malaysia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.027. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Malaysia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.102% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Malaysia corresponds to an increase of 101.6 Bhutanese.
Immigrants from Malaysia Integration in Bhutanese Communities

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($65,497 compared to $72,288, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($54,179 compared to $57,078, a difference of 5.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,796 compared to $117,750, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($49,983 compared to $49,894, a difference of 0.18%), median earnings ($52,514 compared to $52,297, a difference of 0.41%), and median female earnings ($43,835 compared to $43,648, a difference of 0.43%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Income
Income MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$49,983
Exceptional
$49,894
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$115,880
Exceptional
$119,800
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$96,292
Exceptional
$100,151
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$52,514
Exceptional
$52,297
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$62,121
Exceptional
$61,759
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$43,835
Exceptional
$43,648
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,179
Exceptional
$57,078
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$107,650
Exceptional
$109,520
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$112,796
Exceptional
$117,750
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Exceptional
$65,497
Exceptional
$72,288
Wage/Income Gap
Fair
26.3%
Tragic
27.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (5.1% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 25.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (15.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 21.2%), and family poverty (8.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 1.6%), single mother poverty (27.3% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 6.5%), and single male poverty (12.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
Poverty
Good
12.0%
Exceptional
10.4%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Exceptional
7.0%
Males
Good
11.0%
Exceptional
9.5%
Females
Excellent
13.0%
Exceptional
11.3%
Females 18 to 24 years
Poor
20.5%
Exceptional
18.2%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.4%
Exceptional
11.4%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
13.4%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
12.5%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
12.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.0%
Exceptional
12.7%
Single Males
Exceptional
12.0%
Exceptional
11.1%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.4%
Exceptional
17.7%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.2%
Exceptional
15.0%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.3%
Exceptional
25.6%
Married Couples
Good
5.1%
Exceptional
4.1%
Seniors Over 65 years
Average
11.0%
Exceptional
9.3%
Seniors Over 75 years
Fair
12.3%
Exceptional
10.6%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.4%
Exceptional
9.2%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.4% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 5.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.020%), unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.54%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 0.56%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
Unemployment
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.9%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Exceptional
4.9%
Females
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Youth < 25
Exceptional
11.3%
Exceptional
11.2%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Excellent
17.2%
Exceptional
16.4%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
10.0%
Exceptional
10.0%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
5.2%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Exceptional
4.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Exceptional
4.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Excellent
4.7%
Exceptional
4.6%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Average
4.9%
Exceptional
4.5%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.8%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
7.9%
Exceptional
8.0%
Women w/ Children < 6
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.2%
Exceptional
8.1%
Women w/ Children < 18
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
5.0%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (84.6% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.030%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.1% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.15%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.20%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Excellent
65.5%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.1%
Exceptional
80.2%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Tragic
34.3%
Fair
36.3%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Tragic
73.3%
Excellent
75.4%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Good
84.8%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.1%
Excellent
85.0%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Excellent
84.6%
Excellent
84.7%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.2%
Exceptional
83.5%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 7.2%), married-couple households (47.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.87%), births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 1.9%), and divorced or separated (11.0% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
Family Households
Poor
64.0%
Exceptional
65.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
27.9%
Fair
27.3%
Married-couple Households
Excellent
47.2%
Exceptional
49.3%
Average Family Size
Fair
3.22
Excellent
3.25
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.0%
Exceptional
2.1%
Single Mother Households
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.3%
Currently Married
Excellent
47.3%
Exceptional
48.6%
Divorced or Separated
Exceptional
11.0%
Exceptional
11.2%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
27.4%
Exceptional
27.9%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (13.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 55.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 32.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (86.5% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 5.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 21.6%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
No Vehicles Available
Tragic
13.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
1+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
86.5%
Exceptional
91.4%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.7%
Exceptional
59.1%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.3%
Exceptional
22.2%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.9%
Exceptional
7.8%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 29.9%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 10.4%), and master's degree (18.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.3% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.44%), nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%), and kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.57%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.3%
Exceptional
1.8%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.7%
Exceptional
98.2%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.2%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Exceptional
98.1%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Exceptional
98.1%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Exceptional
97.9%
5th Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Exceptional
97.7%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Exceptional
97.5%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.6%
Exceptional
96.6%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.3%
Exceptional
96.4%
9th Grade
Poor
94.5%
Exceptional
95.7%
10th Grade
Fair
93.5%
Exceptional
94.9%
11th Grade
Fair
92.4%
Exceptional
94.0%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Average
91.3%
Exceptional
93.0%
High School Diploma
Good
89.3%
Exceptional
91.2%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.5%
Exceptional
88.4%
College, Under 1 year
Exceptional
69.3%
Exceptional
70.3%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
64.3%
Exceptional
64.6%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
52.5%
Exceptional
51.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
45.0%
Exceptional
42.7%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
18.9%
Exceptional
17.2%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.7%
Exceptional
5.4%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.6%
Exceptional
2.3%

Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Malaysia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.7% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 17.2%), male disability (10.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 9.2%), and disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.91%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Immigrants from Malaysia vs Bhutanese Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from MalaysiaBhutanese
Disability
Exceptional
10.6%
Exceptional
11.2%
Males
Exceptional
10.0%
Excellent
11.0%
Females
Exceptional
11.1%
Exceptional
11.5%
Age | Under 5 years
Exceptional
1.1%
Exceptional
1.2%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Exceptional
5.0%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
5.9%
Exceptional
6.2%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
9.7%
Exceptional
9.8%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.4%
Exceptional
21.5%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.4%
Good
47.1%
Vision
Exceptional
1.9%
Exceptional
2.0%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.7%
Tragic
3.2%
Cognitive
Good
17.1%
Exceptional
16.6%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.5%
Exceptional
5.8%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Exceptional
2.4%