Immigrants from Grenada vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 63,427,318 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Grenada communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Grenada within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.099% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Grenada corresponds to a decrease of 99.1 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (16.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 66.8%), householder income over 65 years ($50,747 compared to $72,288, a difference of 42.4%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,552 compared to $117,750, a difference of 37.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($41,932 compared to $43,648, a difference of 4.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,538 compared to $57,078, a difference of 4.7%), and median earnings ($45,596 compared to $52,297, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (17.8% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 92.9%), married-couple family poverty (7.3% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 78.0%), and family poverty (12.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 75.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.9% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 12.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (25.7% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 56.9%), male unemployment (7.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 52.7%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (6.2% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 42.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 7.3%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 11.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (25.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 43.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (67.2% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 12.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (83.3% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.6%), in labor force | age 30-34 (83.5% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.8% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (8.2% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 54.4%), married-couple households (37.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 31.4%), and births to unmarried women (36.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 30.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.34 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.8%), family households (62.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 5.1%), and single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (37.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 330.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (2.7% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 185.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (62.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 45.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (28.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 106.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (9.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 144.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 69.4%), no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 53.0%), and professional degree (3.7% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 45.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Grenada and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.2% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 46.4%), disability age under 5 (0.94% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 23.9%), and ambulatory disability (6.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 20.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.9% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.8%), disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.1%), and male disability (10.5% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 4.8%).