Immigrants from Micronesia vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 60,301,560 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Micronesia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.173. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Micronesia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.456% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Micronesia corresponds to a decrease of 455.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($80,544 compared to $109,520, a difference of 36.0%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,864 compared to $117,750, a difference of 34.0%), and per capita income ($37,464 compared to $49,894, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.4% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 10.4%), householder income under 25 years ($50,691 compared to $57,078, a difference of 12.6%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,000 compared to $72,288, a difference of 18.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 46.6%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.3% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 45.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (19.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 44.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 7.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.5%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.7% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 14.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.1% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 36.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 26.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.0% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 15.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.11%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 10.7%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 3.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.1% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.3%), single father households (2.6% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 21.4%), and births to unmarried women (32.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.2% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.16%), average family size (3.32 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 15.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 7.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.1% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.3%), professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 68.1%), and master's degree (10.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 59.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.26%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Micronesia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (12.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 31.3%), ambulatory disability (7.0% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 21.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (26.1% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 21.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (50.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 6.4%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.1%), and self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.0%).