Immigrants from Sudan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 115,737,854 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Sudan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.050. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Sudan within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.015% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Sudan corresponds to an increase of 14.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($86,109 compared to $109,520, a difference of 27.2%), median household income ($79,103 compared to $100,151, a difference of 26.6%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($93,781 compared to $117,750, a difference of 25.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($38,511 compared to $43,648, a difference of 13.3%), wage/income gap (23.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 14.2%), and median earnings ($44,767 compared to $52,297, a difference of 16.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (18.8% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.1%), child poverty under the age of 16 (18.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (18.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 45.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.2% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 8.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 14.1%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 15.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.1%), unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 14.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.5% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 0.59%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.1% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 0.61%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (41.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.4%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (76.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-64 (80.4% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.17%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.20%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (6.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 30.5%), births to unmarried women (33.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 19.1%), and married-couple households (41.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.3% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.11%), average family size (3.22 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), and family households (60.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 41.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.6% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 26.8%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 11.9%), and no vehicles in household (10.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 19.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 27.6%), professional degree (4.9% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.2%), and associate's degree (47.4% compared to 51.4%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (97.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Sudan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 19.3%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.2%), and cognitive disability (18.8% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.0%), male disability (11.0% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.98%).