Houma vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 35,000,811 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Houma communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.597. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Houma within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.051% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Houma corresponds to a decrease of 50.8 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($72,093 compared to $117,750, a difference of 63.3%), householder income over 65 years ($44,822 compared to $72,288, a difference of 61.3%), and median household income ($62,575 compared to $100,151, a difference of 60.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($50,547 compared to $61,759, a difference of 22.2%), householder income under 25 years ($44,356 compared to $57,078, a difference of 28.7%), and median earnings ($38,949 compared to $52,297, a difference of 34.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (23.5% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 111.8%), child poverty among boys under 16 (26.2% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 108.1%), and family poverty (14.6% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 107.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (26.2% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 43.9%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (16.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 53.5%), and married-couple family poverty (6.4% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 55.7%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.8% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 79.9%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (12.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 54.7%), and male unemployment (7.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 43.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 7.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.1% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 13.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (74.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 12.7%), in labor force | age 20-64 (72.7% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 10.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (59.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 10.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (35.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.7% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (81.2% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 4.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (46.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 67.0%), single mother households (7.9% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 50.2%), and single father households (2.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 38.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.7% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.22%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.25, a difference of 2.2%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (4.9% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 58.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (16.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 38.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 3.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 8.6%), and no vehicles in household (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 31.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (2.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 145.4%), doctorate degree (0.96% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 142.3%), and master's degree (7.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 117.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.94%), 2nd grade (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and kindergarten (97.3% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.99%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Houma and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (18.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 90.0%), disability age 5 to 17 (9.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 85.1%), and vision disability (3.4% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 75.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (19.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 16.3%), disability age over 75 (56.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 19.3%), and self-care disability (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.3%).