Pennsylvania German vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 209,761,817 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Pennsylvania German communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.110. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Pennsylvania Germans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.005% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Pennsylvania Germans corresponds to a decrease of 4.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($52,888 compared to $72,288, a difference of 36.7%), median household income ($75,814 compared to $100,151, a difference of 32.1%), and per capita income ($37,842 compared to $49,894, a difference of 31.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($50,852 compared to $57,078, a difference of 12.2%), wage/income gap (30.7% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and median male earnings ($50,878 compared to $61,759, a difference of 21.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (19.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.1%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 42.1%), and single male poverty (15.6% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 40.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 5.8%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 8.1%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (10.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 60.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 36.9%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.2% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 26.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.0% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 0.69%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female unemployment (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.4% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 28.0%), in labor force | age 20-24 (78.0% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (63.4% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.6% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.0%), single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 15.8%), and single mother households (5.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 10.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.32%), family households (66.1% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.41%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.6% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.4%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3 or more vehicles in household (22.3% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.43%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 0.98%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 83.0%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 68.1%), and master's degree (10.7% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 60.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.39%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.40%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Pennsylvania German and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 66.7%), disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (12.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 30.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.080%), disability age over 75 (47.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.18%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.3%).