Immigrants from Russia vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 322,388,310 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Russia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.635. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Russia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.653% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Russia corresponds to an increase of 653.5 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($64,512 compared to $72,288, a difference of 12.0%), per capita income ($52,044 compared to $49,894, a difference of 4.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($113,215 compared to $117,750, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($108,751 compared to $109,520, a difference of 0.71%), householder income under 25 years ($55,891 compared to $57,078, a difference of 2.1%), and median earnings ($53,457 compared to $52,297, a difference of 2.2%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.4% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 27.1%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (11.5% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 23.1%), and married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 22.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 3.3%), female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (18.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 11.1%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.5% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.76%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 2.7%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.42%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.060%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.11%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.3% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.20%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 8.0%), married-couple households (47.0% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 4.8%), and family households (63.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 1.5%), family households with children (26.8% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 2.0%), and currently married (47.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (15.1% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 73.3%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 46.7%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (85.4% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 6.9%), 2 or more vehicles in household (50.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 17.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 31.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.0% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 13.3%), master's degree (19.4% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 11.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (64.7% compared to 64.6%, a difference of 0.20%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.24%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.25%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Russia and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 10.3%), disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 8.8%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 35 to 64 (9.8% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 0.11%), disability age over 75 (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.21%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.54%).