Native/Alaskan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 428,157,564 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.207. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.004% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to an increase of 3.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $49,894, a difference of 49.9%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $119,800, a difference of 48.1%), and median household income ($67,879 compared to $100,151, a difference of 47.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 9.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $57,078, a difference of 19.7%), and median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $43,648, a difference of 29.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (14.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 102.4%), married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 100.0%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (25.6% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 91.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 39.7%), single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 43.0%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.5% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 46.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 71.7%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (7.3% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 66.5%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 58.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.8% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 19.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (6.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 20.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.7% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 24.7%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 8.6%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 8.3%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 8.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 0.72%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (79.3% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 7.0%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 54.2%), single mother households (8.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 52.0%), and single father households (3.2% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 51.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (66.4% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.76%), family households with children (28.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.1%), and average family size (3.45 compared to 3.25, a difference of 6.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 20.4%), 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 5.0%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 2.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 84.0%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 75.3%), and master's degree (9.9% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 73.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.27%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.28%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 66.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (15.3% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 55.6%), and vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 51.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 9.5%), disability age over 75 (53.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 12.7%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 17.7%).