Comanche vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Comanche
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Comanche
Bhutanese
1,908
SOCIAL INDEX
16.6/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
283rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Comanche Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 104,671,771 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Comanche communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.356. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Comanche within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.029% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Comanche corresponds to an increase of 28.9 Bhutanese.
Comanche vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($85,787 compared to $117,750, a difference of 37.3%), median household income ($73,747 compared to $100,151, a difference of 35.8%), and median family income ($88,556 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%), householder income under 25 years ($47,518 compared to $57,078, a difference of 20.1%), and median female earnings ($35,661 compared to $43,648, a difference of 22.4%).
Income Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $38,088 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,556 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $73,747 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,519 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $48,202 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,661 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,518 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,152 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,787 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,922 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Excellent 25.0% | Tragic 27.0% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among boys under 16 (20.1% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 59.4%), child poverty under the age of 16 (19.9% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 58.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (20.2% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 58.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.8% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 21.2%), single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.4%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (12.1% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 29.1%).
Poverty Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 15.0% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 11.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 16.2% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 23.6% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.5% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 19.9% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 16.0% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 25.6% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.5% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 33.9% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 12.8% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.3% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 25.4%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (20.2% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 23.4%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.2% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 1.8%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.6% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 5.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.8% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 6.0%).
Unemployment Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Poor 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Poor 11.8% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 20.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Excellent 10.2% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.8% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.1% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.6% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 6.7% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Fair 9.0% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.1% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (79.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (81.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.4% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age > 16 (63.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (82.6% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.9%).
Labor Participation Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 63.6% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 77.0% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 37.7% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.4% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 81.9% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 82.6% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 81.5% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 79.2% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.2%), births to unmarried women (36.7% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 31.7%), and divorced or separated (13.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.050%), family households with children (27.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 1.2%), and family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%).
Family Structure Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Tragic 63.5% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Good 27.6% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 44.5% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Excellent 3.25 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.0% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 45.0% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 36.7% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 17.6%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 14.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.5% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.1%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Good 10.2% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 89.9% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.5% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 21.0% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 6.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 53.9%), doctorate degree (1.6% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 47.8%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).
Education Level Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.1% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Good 98.0% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Good 97.9% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Fair 97.0% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Fair 95.8% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Poor 95.5% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Poor 94.6% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 89.9% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 87.9% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.6% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 61.4% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.4% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 39.9% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.9% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.6% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Comanche vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Comanche and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 49.9%), vision disability (2.8% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 45.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.2% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 6.2%), disability age over 75 (51.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.8%), and cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 12.4%).
Disability Metric | Comanche | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 14.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 14.2% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.7% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 28.3% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 51.7% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.8% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.0% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 7.5% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.9% | Exceptional 2.4% |