Estonian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 119,402,396 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Estonian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.192. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Estonians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.123% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Estonians corresponds to a decrease of 123.0 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($51,523 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.8%), householder income over 65 years ($67,926 compared to $72,288, a difference of 6.4%), and median household income ($95,930 compared to $100,151, a difference of 4.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($61,710 compared to $61,759, a difference of 0.080%), wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.34%), and median earnings ($51,772 compared to $52,297, a difference of 1.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (13.0% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 17.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.9%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (14.3% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 12.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.2% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 1.7%), receiving food stamps (9.5% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 2.9%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.6% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 15.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 11.6%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.90%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.3% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.5% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.7% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.8%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 0.14%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.6% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.30%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (29.2% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 4.7%), divorced or separated (11.7% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 4.7%), and family households (62.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.2% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.94%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and single mother households (5.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 1.7%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 22.7%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.9%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.2%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.3%), and no vehicles in household (9.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 11.1%), professional degree (6.0% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 9.5%), and master's degree (18.8% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of ged/equivalency (88.6% compared to 88.4%, a difference of 0.16%), nursery school (98.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Estonian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.5% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 32.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.8% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 8.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 0.58%), cognitive disability (16.7% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.61%), and hearing disability (3.3% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 1.5%).