Creek vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,346,067 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Creek communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.045. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Creek within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.002% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Creek corresponds to an increase of 2.3 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($78,960 compared to $117,750, a difference of 49.1%), median household income ($67,715 compared to $100,151, a difference of 47.9%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($74,847 compared to $109,520, a difference of 46.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 0.54%), householder income under 25 years ($45,371 compared to $57,078, a difference of 25.8%), and median female earnings ($33,437 compared to $43,648, a difference of 30.5%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (24.2% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 81.3%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.5% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 71.9%), and child poverty among boys under 16 (21.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 71.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 9.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.9% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 17.1%), and single father poverty (19.8% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 32.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 32.9%), unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (6.6% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 25.8%), and unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.4% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 23.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.2% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.090%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.6% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.7% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 2.5%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (39.1% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.7% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 7.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (75.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 6.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (74.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (80.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (80.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 5.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.6% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 34.8%), single mother households (7.0% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 33.1%), and divorced or separated (14.4% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 28.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.38%), average family size (3.20 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.6%), and family households (64.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 12.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 8.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 1.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (58.3% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 1.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.1% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 75.7%), doctorate degree (1.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 72.4%), and master's degree (10.5% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 63.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 9th grade (95.6% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.090%), nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.18%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Creek and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (16.9% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 71.7%), vision disability (3.2% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 63.5%), and ambulatory disability (8.5% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 46.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (51.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 9.3%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.3%), and self-care disability (2.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.0%).