Immigrants from Lebanon vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 207,767,183 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Lebanon communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.367. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Lebanon within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.083% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Lebanon corresponds to a decrease of 82.6 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income under 25 years ($50,729 compared to $57,078, a difference of 12.5%), householder income over 65 years ($64,521 compared to $72,288, a difference of 12.0%), and median household income ($91,887 compared to $100,151, a difference of 9.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.5% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 2.1%), median male earnings ($58,835 compared to $61,759, a difference of 5.0%), and median earnings ($49,682 compared to $52,297, a difference of 5.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (6.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 60.2%), child poverty among boys under 16 (17.0% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 35.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (16.8% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 34.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 25-34 year olds (12.2% compared to 11.4%, a difference of 6.7%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 9.0%), and single female poverty (19.6% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 10.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (7.9% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 17.9%), unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 16.6%), and unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (6.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.4%, a difference of 0.49%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.54%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 20-24 (73.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (82.7% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (83.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (82.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age > 16 (64.5% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (25.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 10.1%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 5.2%), and family households with children (28.6% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.51%), divorced or separated (11.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 0.67%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.83%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 23.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.8% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.29%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.2% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 3.3%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 28.0%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 3.4%), and college, under 1 year (68.3% compared to 70.3%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.37%), kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%), and 1st grade (97.8% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.38%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Lebanon and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 9.5%), self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.9%), and vision disability (2.1% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 4.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (11.5% compared to 11.5%, a difference of 0.12%), ambulatory disability (5.8% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 0.49%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.98%).