Crow vs Bhutanese Community Comparison
COMPARE
Crow
Bhutanese
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Crow
Bhutanese
2,555
SOCIAL INDEX
23.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
251st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
10,144
SOCIAL INDEX
98.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
3rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Bhutanese Integration in Crow Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 56,979,191 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Crow communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.145. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Crow within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.030% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Crow corresponds to a decrease of 30.4 Bhutanese.
Crow vs Bhutanese Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($74,257 compared to $117,750, a difference of 58.6%), median household income ($63,681 compared to $100,151, a difference of 57.3%), and per capita income ($31,729 compared to $49,894, a difference of 57.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,012 compared to $57,078, a difference of 21.4%), median female earnings ($35,266 compared to $43,648, a difference of 23.8%), and median earnings ($38,707 compared to $52,297, a difference of 35.1%).
Income Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $31,729 | Exceptional $49,894 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $76,605 | Exceptional $119,800 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $63,681 | Exceptional $100,151 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $38,707 | Exceptional $52,297 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $42,434 | Exceptional $61,759 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,266 | Exceptional $43,648 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $47,012 | Exceptional $57,078 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $71,337 | Exceptional $109,520 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $74,257 | Exceptional $117,750 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $49,234 | Exceptional $72,288 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 19.1% | Tragic 27.0% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (9.6% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 133.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (31.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 132.1%), and family poverty (16.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 128.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (13.4% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 45.6%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (15.9% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 50.7%), and single mother poverty (38.6% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 50.8%).
Poverty Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
Poverty | Tragic 20.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Families | Tragic 16.1% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Males | Tragic 19.1% | Exceptional 9.5% |
Females | Tragic 22.1% | Exceptional 11.3% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 33.2% | Exceptional 18.2% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 22.7% | Exceptional 11.4% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 31.0% | Exceptional 13.4% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 26.0% | Exceptional 12.5% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 26.3% | Exceptional 12.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 26.4% | Exceptional 12.7% |
Single Males | Tragic 23.3% | Exceptional 11.1% |
Single Females | Tragic 32.4% | Exceptional 17.7% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 30.3% | Exceptional 15.0% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 38.6% | Exceptional 25.6% |
Married Couples | Tragic 9.6% | Exceptional 4.1% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 15.2% | Exceptional 9.3% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 15.9% | Exceptional 10.6% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.4% | Exceptional 9.2% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (15.7% compared to 4.4%, a difference of 260.5%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (16.9% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 249.3%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (17.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 246.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 9.2%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 14.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (5.9% compared to 4.6%, a difference of 27.4%).
Unemployment Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
Unemployment | Tragic 11.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Males | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Females | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 20.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 26.2% | Exceptional 16.4% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Tragic 18.7% | Exceptional 10.0% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 15.4% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 10.3% | Exceptional 5.2% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 15.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 13.7% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.9% | Exceptional 4.6% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.0% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 17.4% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 16.9% | Exceptional 4.8% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 5.9% | Exceptional 8.0% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.2% | Exceptional 8.1% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 8.2% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 30-34 (75.9% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 11.9%), in labor force | age 35-44 (76.5% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 10.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.3% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.9% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (38.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 6.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (78.3% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 6.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Tragic 60.8% | Excellent 65.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 73.3% | Exceptional 80.2% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 38.5% | Fair 36.3% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.9% | Excellent 75.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 78.6% | Good 84.8% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 75.9% | Excellent 85.0% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 76.5% | Excellent 84.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 78.3% | Exceptional 83.5% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.5% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 66.3%), births to unmarried women (40.4% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 44.8%), and single mother households (7.4% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.28%), family households (65.3% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.88%), and average family size (3.82 compared to 3.25, a difference of 17.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.3% | Exceptional 65.9% |
Family Households with Children | Fair 27.4% | Fair 27.3% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 41.4% | Exceptional 49.3% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.82 | Excellent 3.25 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.5% | Exceptional 2.1% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.4% | Exceptional 5.3% |
Currently Married | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 48.6% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 14.1% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 40.4% | Exceptional 27.9% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.7%), 2 or more vehicles in household (55.7% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.0%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 0.22%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.5% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 0.99%), and 1 or more vehicles in household (89.3% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.3%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.3% | Exceptional 91.4% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Good 55.7% | Exceptional 59.1% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.5% | Exceptional 22.2% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.8% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 72.2%), master's degree (10.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 61.7%), and doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 57.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 10th grade (94.7% compared to 94.9%, a difference of 0.18%), 9th grade (96.1% compared to 95.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and 11th grade (92.9% compared to 94.0%, a difference of 1.2%).
Education Level Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.6% | Exceptional 1.8% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 99.7% | Exceptional 98.2% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.2% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 98.1% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 99.6% | Exceptional 97.9% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 99.5% | Exceptional 97.7% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 99.4% | Exceptional 97.5% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 99.1% | Exceptional 96.6% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 99.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.1% | Exceptional 95.7% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 94.7% | Exceptional 94.9% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Exceptional 94.0% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 90.0% | Exceptional 93.0% |
High School Diploma | Poor 88.4% | Exceptional 91.2% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 83.8% | Exceptional 88.4% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 60.2% | Exceptional 70.3% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 54.5% | Exceptional 64.6% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.6% | Exceptional 51.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 27.7% | Exceptional 42.7% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.6% | Exceptional 17.2% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.2% | Exceptional 5.4% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.5% | Exceptional 2.3% |
Crow vs Bhutanese Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Crow and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.6% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 48.6%), disability age 18 to 34 (8.3% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 32.8%), and disability age 65 to 74 (27.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 30.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (17.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 4.6%), disability age over 75 (49.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 5.3%), and self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 5.6%).
Disability Metric | Crow | Bhutanese |
Disability | Tragic 12.9% | Exceptional 11.2% |
Males | Tragic 13.1% | Excellent 11.0% |
Females | Tragic 12.7% | Exceptional 11.5% |
Age | Under 5 years | Average 1.2% | Exceptional 1.2% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 8.3% | Exceptional 6.2% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 14.6% | Exceptional 9.8% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.9% | Exceptional 21.5% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.6% | Good 47.1% |
Vision | Tragic 2.5% | Exceptional 2.0% |
Hearing | Tragic 4.2% | Tragic 3.2% |
Cognitive | Fair 17.3% | Exceptional 16.6% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.9% | Exceptional 5.8% |
Self-Care | Poor 2.5% | Exceptional 2.4% |