Guatemalan vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 365,076,656 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.109. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.004% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 4.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median family income ($88,295 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $117,750, a difference of 34.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,331 compared to $109,520, a difference of 33.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $57,078, a difference of 10.8%), wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 19.3%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $43,648, a difference of 22.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 71.8%), child poverty under the age of 16 (21.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 69.0%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (21.4% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 67.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.6% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.2%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (13.8% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 24.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.0%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.2%), and female unemployment (6.0% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (10.5% compared to 10.0%, a difference of 5.1%), unemployment among youth under 25 years (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 9.3%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 2.9%), in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 2.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.18%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.19%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.7% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 45.2%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 40.3%), and births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 0.98%), average family size (3.40 compared to 3.25, a difference of 4.8%), and family households with children (28.9% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 5.9%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 26.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 12.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 9.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 10.8%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 92.1%), doctorate degree (1.4% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 64.4%), and professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.7%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 1.8%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.0%, a difference of 19.7%), disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male disability (11.1% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 2.0%), and disability (11.6% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 3.5%).