Ghanaian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 181,374,059 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Ghanaian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.126. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Ghanaians within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.014% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Ghanaians corresponds to a decrease of 13.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($90,137 compared to $109,520, a difference of 21.5%), median family income ($98,877 compared to $119,800, a difference of 21.2%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($97,277 compared to $117,750, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median female earnings ($40,429 compared to $43,648, a difference of 8.0%), householder income under 25 years ($52,594 compared to $57,078, a difference of 8.5%), and median earnings ($46,440 compared to $52,297, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (14.0% compared to 9.2%, a difference of 51.3%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 49.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (18.6% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 48.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (16.7% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 11.4%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.8% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 14.1%), and single mother poverty (29.4% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 14.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 23.9%), male unemployment (6.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 23.3%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.2% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 22.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.0% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 10.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 10.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.3% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 2.7%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (74.3% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.7% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.16%), in labor force | age 20-64 (80.1% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.8% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 48.6%), births to unmarried women (34.3% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 22.9%), and married-couple households (42.2% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.29 compared to 3.25, a difference of 1.1%), family households (63.5% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.8%), and family households with children (28.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 4.5%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 88.7%), 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 48.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (83.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 9.3%), 2 or more vehicles in household (48.0% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 23.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (16.4% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 36.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.6% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 42.0%), professional degree (4.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 28.0%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.5% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.79%), kindergarten (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%), and 1st grade (97.4% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.80%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Ghanaian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.5% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.7%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.7% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 18.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.95%), male disability (10.8% compared to 11.0%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability (11.5% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 2.0%).