Immigrants from Iran vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,258,217 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Immigrant from Iran communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.225. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Iran within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.042% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Iran corresponds to a decrease of 42.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($57,759 compared to $49,894, a difference of 15.8%), median male earnings ($69,284 compared to $61,759, a difference of 12.2%), and median earnings ($57,612 compared to $52,297, a difference of 10.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($55,880 compared to $57,078, a difference of 2.1%), householder income over 65 years ($75,081 compared to $72,288, a difference of 3.9%), and wage/income gap (29.1% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.2% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 15.4%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.4% compared to 9.3%, a difference of 11.7%), and married-couple family poverty (4.5% compared to 4.1%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty among boys under 16 (12.5% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 0.36%), child poverty under the age of 16 (12.4% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 1.2%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (12.6% compared to 12.7%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.1% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 13.5%), female unemployment (5.5% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 12.3%), and unemployment among ages 45 to 54 years (4.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 11.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.3%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (7.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.1%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.4% compared to 5.2%, a difference of 3.4%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (32.0% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 13.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (71.8% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 5.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.4% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.50%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (84.9% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 0.10%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.4% compared to 84.7%, a difference of 0.35%), and in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.42%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (24.0% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 16.4%), single father households (1.9% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 11.7%), and single mother households (4.8% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 9.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (48.7% compared to 48.6%, a difference of 0.15%), family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.29%), and married-couple households (48.8% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.93%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.5% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 20.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (20.0% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 11.1%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.32%), 2 or more vehicles in household (57.9% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 2.0%), and no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 4.2%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (7.3% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 34.7%), doctorate degree (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 30.4%), and master's degree (21.6% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 25.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.21%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.22%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Iran and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.00% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 17.2%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 16.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (8.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 15.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.060%), cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.19%), and disability age 65 to 74 (20.9% compared to 21.5%, a difference of 2.9%).