Blackfeet vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 277,631,417 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Blackfeet communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.542. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Blackfeet within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.007% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Blackfeet corresponds to a decrease of 6.9 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in median household income ($73,509 compared to $100,151, a difference of 36.2%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($86,595 compared to $117,750, a difference of 36.0%), and median family income ($88,717 compared to $119,800, a difference of 35.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (25.2% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 6.9%), householder income under 25 years ($48,603 compared to $57,078, a difference of 17.4%), and median female earnings ($35,864 compared to $43,648, a difference of 21.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (21.8% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 63.4%), child poverty among boys under 16 (20.4% compared to 12.6%, a difference of 61.7%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (20.2% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 61.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (18.5% compared to 15.0%, a difference of 23.7%), single mother poverty (33.2% compared to 25.6%, a difference of 29.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (13.7% compared to 10.6%, a difference of 29.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.7% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 29.4%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 27.7%), and unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (7.9% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 8.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.5% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 9.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.3% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 9.6%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (38.9% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 7.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.0% compared to 83.5%, a difference of 4.4%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (77.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 0.070%), in labor force | age 30-34 (82.8% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.6% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 2.7%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (7.5% compared to 5.3%, a difference of 41.7%), births to unmarried women (37.9% compared to 27.9%, a difference of 36.0%), and single father households (2.7% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 27.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.24 compared to 3.25, a difference of 0.16%), family households with children (27.5% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.70%), and family households (63.6% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 11.3%), no vehicles in household (9.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 9.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.6% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 0.88%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.4% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 4.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (3.5% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 56.5%), doctorate degree (1.5% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 54.3%), and master's degree (12.1% compared to 17.2%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1st grade (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.12%), nursery school (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%), and kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Blackfeet and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (14.1% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 42.9%), disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 40.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.6% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 34.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (48.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.6%), cognitive disability (18.3% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 10.2%), and hearing disability (3.6% compared to 3.2%, a difference of 12.9%).