Norwegian vs Bhutanese Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 441,645,367 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Bhutanese within Norwegian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.040. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Norwegians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.001% in Bhutanese. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Norwegians corresponds to an increase of 1.2 Bhutanese.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in householder income over 65 years ($61,104 compared to $72,288, a difference of 18.3%), median household income ($86,084 compared to $100,151, a difference of 16.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($103,682 compared to $117,750, a difference of 13.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.0% compared to 27.0%, a difference of 7.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,127 compared to $57,078, a difference of 7.4%), and median male earnings ($55,965 compared to $61,759, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (20.8% compared to 17.7%, a difference of 17.7%), single male poverty (12.9% compared to 11.1%, a difference of 16.7%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 18.2%, a difference of 13.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male poverty (9.5% compared to 9.5%, a difference of 0.65%), poverty (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty (11.5% compared to 11.3%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.8% compared to 8.0%, a difference of 21.6%), female unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 18.0%), and unemployment (4.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 16.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.2%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.7% compared to 4.8%, a difference of 2.9%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (46.2% compared to 36.3%, a difference of 27.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (80.1% compared to 75.4%, a difference of 6.2%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (86.1% compared to 84.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.7% compared to 65.5%, a difference of 0.33%), in labor force | age 20-64 (81.0% compared to 80.2%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 85.0%, a difference of 0.91%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.4% compared to 2.1%, a difference of 13.8%), divorced or separated (12.1% compared to 11.2%, a difference of 8.5%), and average family size (3.08 compared to 3.25, a difference of 5.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (27.4% compared to 27.3%, a difference of 0.26%), married-couple households (49.5% compared to 49.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and family households (63.9% compared to 65.9%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 35.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (23.9% compared to 22.2%, a difference of 7.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (8.0% compared to 7.8%, a difference of 2.5%), 1 or more vehicles in household (93.7% compared to 91.4%, a difference of 2.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (62.8% compared to 59.1%, a difference of 6.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (1.3% compared to 1.8%, a difference of 33.6%), professional degree (4.2% compared to 5.4%, a difference of 29.8%), and doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 26.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.50%), kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.51%), and 1st grade (98.7% compared to 98.2%, a difference of 0.52%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Norwegian and Bhutanese communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.7% compared to 1.2%, a difference of 43.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.6% compared to 6.2%, a difference of 22.5%), and disability age 35 to 64 (11.5% compared to 9.8%, a difference of 16.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (16.5% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 0.38%), ambulatory disability (5.9% compared to 5.8%, a difference of 2.5%), and disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 3.4%).