Native/Alaskan vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,621,908 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Native/Alaskan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.018. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Natives/Alaskans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.000% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Natives/Alaskans corresponds to a decrease of 0.1 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($33,279 compared to $38,120, a difference of 14.5%), median family income ($80,908 compared to $91,296, a difference of 12.8%), and wage/income gap (24.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($47,704 compared to $49,364, a difference of 3.5%), median female earnings ($33,806 compared to $35,498, a difference of 5.0%), and median male earnings ($44,775 compared to $48,254, a difference of 7.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (8.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 64.6%), receiving food stamps (17.3% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 58.4%), and family poverty (14.3% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 56.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother poverty (36.6% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 17.2%), single female poverty (28.2% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 22.3%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (25.4% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 26.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years (9.8% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 73.6%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (11.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 73.2%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (8.2% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 68.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (6.0% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 5.5%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (11.5% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 32.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (21.5% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 32.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.9%), in labor force | age 45-54 (77.1% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age > 16 (60.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 30-34 (79.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.1%), in labor force | age 35-44 (78.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 4.7%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (73.9% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 5.4%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (43.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 55.0%), single father households (3.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 35.4%), and single mother households (8.0% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (28.4% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.67%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.3%), and divorced or separated (13.0% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 5.8%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (8.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 17.4%), 3 or more vehicles in household (22.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.4%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.8% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.21%), no vehicles in household (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (57.0% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in master's degree (9.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 34.9%), bachelor's degree (26.3% compared to 34.8%, a difference of 32.0%), and professional degree (3.0% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 26.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.090%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.10%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Native/Alaskan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.9% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 71.8%), vision disability (3.0% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 29.5%), and hearing disability (4.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 0.50%), cognitive disability (18.1% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 1.7%), and disability age 18 to 34 (8.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 2.0%).