Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Middle Africa
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Middle Africa

Hmong

Fair
Average
3,358
SOCIAL INDEX
31.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
223rd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Middle Africa Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,474,818 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Middle Africa communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.430. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Middle Africa within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.359% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Middle Africa corresponds to an increase of 359.1 Hmong.
Immigrants from Middle Africa Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 23.8%), median female earnings ($37,965 compared to $35,498, a difference of 7.0%), and per capita income ($39,529 compared to $38,120, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median male earnings ($49,201 compared to $48,254, a difference of 2.0%), median household income ($77,559 compared to $75,839, a difference of 2.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($82,254 compared to $84,258, a difference of 2.4%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,529
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$93,593
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$77,559
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,416
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$49,201
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,965
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Tragic
$47,916
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$82,254
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$91,293
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,375
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Exceptional
22.4%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.9% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 18.5%), child poverty among boys under 16 (18.9% compared to 16.6%, a difference of 13.8%), and single male poverty (12.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 11.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.89%), single father poverty (15.6% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.5%), and single mother poverty (30.3% compared to 31.2%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
Poverty
Tragic
14.0%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Tragic
10.1%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.7%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
15.2%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Tragic
22.1%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.8%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
19.7%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
19.0%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
18.9%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
19.2%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Good
12.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.3%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.6%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Tragic
30.3%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Fair
11.1%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Good
12.1%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.9%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.3% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 65.5%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (5.8% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 28.7%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.5% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 0.27%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.1% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
Unemployment
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Tragic
5.5%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Fair
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Tragic
11.9%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.1%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Fair
10.4%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Average
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.8%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Excellent
4.4%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.5%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.6%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
4.9%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Exceptional
8.3%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Tragic
8.1%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Poor
9.1%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (67.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 5.7%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.3%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.5% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.3% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
67.7%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.5%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.9%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
76.6%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.2%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
84.9%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.3%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (34.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 26.0%), single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 21.0%), and married-couple households (41.8% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.25 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.3%), family households with children (28.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 2.2%), and divorced or separated (12.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 2.9%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
Family Households
Tragic
61.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
28.0%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Tragic
41.8%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Excellent
3.25
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.5%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.7%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Tragic
43.0%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.7%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
34.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 20.5%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 15.1%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.9% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.26%), no vehicles in household (10.2% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (53.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 8.2%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
No Vehicles Available
Good
10.2%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Good
89.9%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
53.4%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
18.2%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.8%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 23.4%), doctorate degree (1.9% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 20.5%), and professional degree (4.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 12.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.44%), kindergarten (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and 1st grade (97.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.46%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.4%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.6%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.5%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.4%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.8%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
95.4%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
95.1%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
94.2%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.9%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
91.6%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
90.0%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
88.0%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
84.4%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Poor
63.9%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Poor
58.0%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Poor
44.7%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Fair
36.6%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Fair
14.6%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Fair
4.2%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Good
1.9%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Middle Africa and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 24.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.3%), and male disability (11.1% compared to 12.5%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of cognitive disability (18.6% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 0.71%), disability age over 75 (47.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 2.3%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 3.0%).
Immigrants from Middle Africa vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from Middle AfricaHmong
Disability
Good
11.6%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Good
11.1%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Good
12.1%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Good
1.2%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.9%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
6.9%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
24.1%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Good
47.1%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Fair
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Exceptional
2.8%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
18.6%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.9%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%