Turkish vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,124,546 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Turkish communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.600. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Turks within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.110% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Turks corresponds to an increase of 110.4 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($52,391 compared to $38,120, a difference of 37.4%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($117,814 compared to $88,115, a difference of 33.7%), and median male earnings ($64,253 compared to $48,254, a difference of 33.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 0.020%), householder income under 25 years ($54,266 compared to $49,364, a difference of 9.9%), and householder income over 65 years ($68,037 compared to $56,339, a difference of 20.8%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.4% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 27.8%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 27.7%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 27.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.73%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.6%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 59.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.34%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.9% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.0%), and unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (5.1% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.7% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (73.9% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.3%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.8% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.1% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 19.8%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.6%), and divorced or separated (11.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 9.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), average family size (3.16 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.4%), and currently married (47.8% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 19.8%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 13.8%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.3% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (11.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 12.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.7% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 69.8%), professional degree (6.2% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 65.7%), and master's degree (19.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 48.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.5% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.14%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.16%), and kindergarten (98.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.17%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Turkish and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 36.2%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 30.6%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.1% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 24.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.040%), disability age over 75 (45.7% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.5%), and self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 7.1%).