Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Carpatho Rusyn
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Carpatho Rusyns
Hmong
7,651
SOCIAL INDEX
74.0/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
110th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Carpatho Rusyn Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 18,089,953 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Carpatho Rusyn communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.811. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Carpatho Rusyns within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.162% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Carpatho Rusyns corresponds to an increase of 161.6 Hmong.
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($47,248 compared to $38,120, a difference of 23.9%), median male earnings ($57,572 compared to $48,254, a difference of 19.3%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,449 compared to $84,258, a difference of 18.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income under 25 years ($49,113 compared to $49,364, a difference of 0.51%), wage/income gap (27.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($61,093 compared to $56,339, a difference of 8.4%).
Income Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $47,248 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $107,502 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Good $86,635 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,617 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $57,572 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,825 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $49,113 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,449 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Good $102,777 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Average $61,093 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Tragic 27.3% | Tragic 27.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (3.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 26.3%), family poverty (7.5% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 20.9%), and single female poverty (20.0% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 15.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (21.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 4.8%), receiving food stamps (10.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 4.8%), and single male poverty (13.4% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 5.6%).
Poverty Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
Poverty | Exceptional 11.3% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Exceptional 7.5% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Exceptional 10.2% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Exceptional 12.2% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 21.0% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Fair 17.5% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.9% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.4% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.3% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.4% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 20.0% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Average 29.1% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Exceptional 3.9% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Exceptional 9.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Exceptional 11.1% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Exceptional 10.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 42.1%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.8%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (8.0% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.0%), unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years (9.8% compared to 9.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and unemployment (4.7% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.8%).
Unemployment Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 4.8% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Poor 17.9% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 9.8% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Good 4.8% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.9% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Tragic 9.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.0% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 10.0% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.4% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (86.2% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.5%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (87.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 3.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.090%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.5% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.2%).
Labor Participation Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Average 65.0% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.3% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 76.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Exceptional 87.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Exceptional 86.2% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 85.6% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.5% | Tragic 81.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in family households with children (25.2% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 13.6%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.9%), and single mother households (5.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.040%), married-couple households (45.7% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.7%), and divorced or separated (11.9% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 3.6%).
Family Structure Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
Family Households | Tragic 61.1% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Tragic 25.2% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Poor 45.7% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Tragic 3.06 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.1% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Exceptional 5.7% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Excellent 11.9% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.9% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 26.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (18.0% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 16.3%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.13%), no vehicles in household (10.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 2.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (54.4% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.2%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Fair 10.7% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Fair 89.5% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Poor 54.4% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 18.0% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 5.5% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 44.0%), no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 41.9%), and professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.63%), nursery school (98.7% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.64%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.64%).
Education Level Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Exceptional 1.4% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Exceptional 98.7% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Exceptional 98.7% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Exceptional 98.6% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Exceptional 98.5% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Exceptional 98.4% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Exceptional 98.3% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Exceptional 98.1% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Exceptional 96.7% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Exceptional 95.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Exceptional 94.8% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Exceptional 93.6% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Exceptional 92.1% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Exceptional 89.1% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.9% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.2% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 50.6% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 42.1% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 17.5% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.3% | Tragic 1.6% |
Carpatho Rusyn vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Carpatho Rusyn and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 25.8%), disability age 65 to 74 (21.6% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 19.0%), and disability age 18 to 34 (6.9% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.70%), self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.77%), and disability age 5 to 17 (6.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Disability Metric | Carpatho Rusyn | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 12.3% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 11.9% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Tragic 1.4% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Tragic 6.3% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 6.9% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Fair 11.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 21.6% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 44.8% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.4% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.4% | Excellent 2.4% |