Chilean vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Chilean
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Chileans
Hmong
8,759
SOCIAL INDEX
85.1/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
51st/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Chilean Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,011,477 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Chilean communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.951. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Chileans within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.294% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Chileans corresponds to an increase of 293.9 Hmong.
Chilean vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($46,459 compared to $38,120, a difference of 21.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,611 compared to $88,115, a difference of 21.0%), and median household income ($90,605 compared to $75,839, a difference of 19.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.3%), householder income under 25 years ($53,185 compared to $49,364, a difference of 7.7%), and householder income over 65 years ($63,957 compared to $56,339, a difference of 13.5%).
Income Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Exceptional $46,459 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Exceptional $108,429 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Exceptional $90,605 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Exceptional $48,504 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Exceptional $56,973 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Exceptional $40,757 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Exceptional $53,185 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Exceptional $99,900 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Exceptional $106,611 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Exceptional $63,957 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Fair 26.3% | Tragic 27.7% |
Chilean vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.9% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 19.1%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 19.1%), and single female poverty (19.9% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 16.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.66%), receiving food stamps (11.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.73%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.1%).
Poverty Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
Poverty | Excellent 11.8% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Excellent 8.5% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Excellent 10.7% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Excellent 12.9% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Exceptional 19.1% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Exceptional 12.8% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Exceptional 15.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Exceptional 14.8% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.0% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Exceptional 15.1% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Exceptional 11.9% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Exceptional 19.9% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Exceptional 27.9% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Excellent 4.9% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Fair 11.2% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Poor 12.6% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Excellent 11.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Chilean vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 62.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.0%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 21.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 1.7%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 4.3%).
Unemployment Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Exceptional 5.0% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Average 17.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Excellent 6.5% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.2% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Exceptional 4.4% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 4.3% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.7% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Good 4.8% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Excellent 5.1% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Exceptional 8.4% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Exceptional 7.2% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Excellent 8.8% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Good 5.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Chilean vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 8.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (84.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.1%), and in labor force | age > 16 (66.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.0% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%).
Labor Participation Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 66.0% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Exceptional 80.1% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Poor 35.8% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Poor 74.5% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Excellent 85.0% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Excellent 84.9% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Exceptional 84.7% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Exceptional 83.4% | Tragic 81.7% |
Chilean vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (30.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%), single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (47.0% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.16%), family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.43%), and average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.67%).
Family Structure Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.1% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Exceptional 47.5% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Average 3.23 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Exceptional 2.2% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Good 6.1% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Good 47.0% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Good 12.0% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Good 30.7% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Chilean vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.0%), 3 or more vehicles in household (19.7% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.5%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (90.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.60%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.0%), and no vehicles in household (9.9% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 4.8%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Excellent 9.9% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Good 90.2% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 56.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Good 19.7% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Good 6.4% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Chilean vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 40.4%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 37.0%), and master's degree (16.9% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 26.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.070%), 11th grade (92.9% compared to 92.8%, a difference of 0.070%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%).
Education Level Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Good 2.0% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Average 98.0% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Average 98.0% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Average 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Average 97.9% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Average 97.8% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Average 97.5% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Average 97.3% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Average 97.1% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Average 96.0% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Average 95.7% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Good 95.0% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Good 93.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Excellent 92.9% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Excellent 91.7% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Good 89.6% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Excellent 86.6% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Exceptional 67.6% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Exceptional 62.0% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Exceptional 49.4% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Exceptional 41.2% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Exceptional 16.9% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Exceptional 5.3% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Exceptional 2.2% | Tragic 1.6% |
Chilean vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Chilean and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 28.4%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 27.9%), and hearing disability (2.9% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 19.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.8%), disability age over 75 (46.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 3.7%), and cognitive disability (17.0% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 8.4%).
Disability Metric | Chilean | Hmong |
Disability | Exceptional 11.1% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Exceptional 10.7% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Exceptional 11.5% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Poor 1.3% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Exceptional 5.4% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Exceptional 6.3% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Exceptional 10.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 22.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Exceptional 46.5% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Exceptional 2.1% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Excellent 2.9% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Excellent 17.0% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Exceptional 5.7% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Exceptional 2.3% | Excellent 2.4% |