Lithuanian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,373,493 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Lithuanian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.651. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Lithuanians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.036% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Lithuanians corresponds to an increase of 36.4 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($49,448 compared to $38,120, a difference of 29.7%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($112,484 compared to $88,115, a difference of 27.7%), and median male earnings ($61,228 compared to $48,254, a difference of 26.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.8%), householder income under 25 years ($53,552 compared to $49,364, a difference of 8.5%), and householder income over 65 years ($65,209 compared to $56,339, a difference of 15.7%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in family poverty (7.2% compared to 9.1%, a difference of 27.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.3%), and child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (18.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 7.2%), single father poverty (17.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 8.9%), and single male poverty (13.0% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 9.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 38.9%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.3%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.1% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 21.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.7% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 2.8%), unemployment (4.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.4%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.3% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 3.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.6% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.2% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (77.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.56%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.8% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.3%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 17.4%), single father households (2.1% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), and family households with children (26.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (64.0% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%), average family size (3.10 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.4%), and married-couple households (48.9% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 22.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.3% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 10.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.73%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.3%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.3%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.3% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 43.8%), professional degree (5.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 43.7%), and no schooling completed (1.4% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 35.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%), kindergarten (98.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.57%), and 1st grade (98.6% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.57%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Lithuanian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 38.1%), disability age 35 to 64 (10.8% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 21.6%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 20.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 2.1%), hearing disability (3.4% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 2.4%), and disability age over 75 (45.1% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 6.9%).