Immigrants from South Central Asia vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,458,546 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from South Central Asia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.068. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from South Central Asia within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.001% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from South Central Asia corresponds to a decrease of 0.8 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in median male earnings ($68,960 compared to $48,254, a difference of 42.9%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($124,188 compared to $88,115, a difference of 40.9%), and median household income ($106,057 compared to $75,839, a difference of 39.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (29.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 5.9%), householder income under 25 years ($57,818 compared to $49,364, a difference of 17.1%), and householder income over 65 years ($70,103 compared to $56,339, a difference of 24.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.3% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 39.9%), child poverty among girls under 16 (12.7% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 37.2%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 36.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.4% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 5.2%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.7%), and single father poverty (14.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 9.5%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 67.4%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.8%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.6% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 24.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among ages 30 to 34 years (4.9% compared to 4.9%, a difference of 0.17%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.2% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.35%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.6% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 0.72%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.6% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.0%), in labor force | age > 16 (67.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.6%), and in labor force | age 20-64 (80.7% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 3.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.2% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.8%), in labor force | age 45-54 (84.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.8%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 20.5%), single mother households (5.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 18.3%), and divorced or separated (10.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.23 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.61%), family households (66.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and family households with children (30.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 5.1%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 21.0%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.1% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 14.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (91.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (56.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (19.3% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 8.5%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 67.4%), professional degree (5.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 57.5%), and master's degree (20.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 54.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 8th grade (96.1% compared to 96.1%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.050%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from South Central Asia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (8.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 48.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 42.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 33.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age over 75 (46.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.8%), self-care disability (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.6%), and disability age under 5 (1.0% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 10.0%).