Immigrants from Latvia vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 20,745,501 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Latvia communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Latvia within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.612% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Latvia corresponds to an increase of 611.5 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($50,914 compared to $38,120, a difference of 33.6%), median male earnings ($61,422 compared to $48,254, a difference of 27.3%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($111,454 compared to $88,115, a difference of 26.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (26.7% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 3.5%), householder income under 25 years ($51,737 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.8%), and householder income over 65 years ($64,298 compared to $56,339, a difference of 14.1%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single female poverty (19.3% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 19.4%), child poverty under the age of 5 (15.6% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 18.9%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (14.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 17.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.0% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.17%), single father poverty (15.8% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 0.63%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.1%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (7.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 75.5%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.3% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 26.3%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 21.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.7% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 0.66%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.8% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and unemployment (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.8% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.3%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.9% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 4.2%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 3.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 20-24 (75.0% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.9% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 22.5%), single mother households (5.5% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and family households with children (25.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 10.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.7% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.68%), married-couple households (46.0% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and average family size (3.13 compared to 3.21, a difference of 2.4%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.5% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 27.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 20.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.1% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.8%), 2 or more vehicles in household (52.2% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 10.7%), and no vehicles in household (12.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 16.7%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.8% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 55.9%), doctorate degree (2.4% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 51.7%), and master's degree (19.1% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 42.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 6th grade (97.4% compared to 97.4%, a difference of 0.060%), 5th grade (97.7% compared to 97.6%, a difference of 0.11%), and 4th grade (97.8% compared to 97.7%, a difference of 0.13%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Latvia and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.8%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.1%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.3% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 18.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 1.6%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.3%), and cognitive disability (17.2% compared to 18.4%, a difference of 7.5%).