Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Immigrants from Brazil
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Immigrants from Brazil

Hmong

Good
Average
7,381
SOCIAL INDEX
71.3/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
119th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Immigrants from Brazil Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 23,987,112 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Immigrant from Brazil communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.204. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Immigrants from Brazil within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.010% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Immigrants from Brazil corresponds to a decrease of 9.6 Hmong.
Immigrants from Brazil Integration in Hmong Communities

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($48,164 compared to $38,120, a difference of 26.4%), median male earnings ($58,324 compared to $48,254, a difference of 20.9%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($106,470 compared to $88,115, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 2.5%), householder income under 25 years ($54,487 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.4%), and householder income over 65 years ($62,364 compared to $56,339, a difference of 10.7%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Income
Income MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
Per Capita Income
Exceptional
$48,164
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Exceptional
$109,418
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Exceptional
$90,907
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Exceptional
$49,463
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Exceptional
$58,324
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Exceptional
$41,273
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Exceptional
$54,487
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Exceptional
$100,534
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Exceptional
$106,470
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Excellent
$62,364
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Tragic
27.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single male poverty (11.7% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 20.9%), single female poverty (19.7% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 17.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (16.0% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 16.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of married-couple family poverty (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.32%), receiving food stamps (10.8% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 0.76%), and single father poverty (15.3% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.9%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
Poverty
Excellent
11.7%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Excellent
8.5%
Average
9.1%
Males
Excellent
10.6%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Excellent
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Exceptional
18.5%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Exceptional
12.8%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Exceptional
16.0%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.4%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Exceptional
15.1%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Exceptional
11.7%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Exceptional
19.7%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
15.3%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Exceptional
27.9%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Excellent
5.0%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Poor
11.3%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Tragic
12.9%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Exceptional
10.8%
Excellent
10.9%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (9.0% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 53.2%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 33.2%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.0% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 3.2%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.3%), and unemployment (5.2% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 5.1%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
Unemployment
Good
5.2%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Excellent
5.2%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Poor
5.4%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Good
11.5%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Excellent
10.1%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Exceptional
6.4%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Excellent
5.3%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Good
4.6%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Tragic
4.9%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Poor
4.9%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
5.6%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Tragic
5.4%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
9.0%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Good
7.5%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Average
9.0%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Tragic
5.7%
Exceptional
4.5%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (37.1% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.3%), in labor force | age > 16 (66.7% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (75.5% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.3%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.5% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 2.2%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.9% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.6%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.7%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Exceptional
80.7%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Good
37.1%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Excellent
75.5%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Exceptional
85.5%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Exceptional
85.0%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Exceptional
83.9%
Tragic
81.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (2.2% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 8.8%), births to unmarried women (29.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 6.9%), and single mother households (6.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 4.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.6% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.93%), average family size (3.18 compared to 3.21, a difference of 1.0%), and married-couple households (46.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.5%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
Family Households
Tragic
63.6%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Average
27.4%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Fair
46.2%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Tragic
3.18
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Exceptional
2.2%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Good
6.1%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Average
46.6%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Good
12.0%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Exceptional
29.6%
Exceptional
27.7%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (5.2% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 33.1%), 3 or more vehicles in household (17.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 22.5%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 9.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (89.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.090%), no vehicles in household (10.8% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.9%), and 2 or more vehicles in household (52.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 9.5%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
No Vehicles Available
Fair
10.8%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Average
89.6%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
52.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
17.1%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Tragic
5.2%
Exceptional
7.0%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (5.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 41.7%), doctorate degree (2.2% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 40.3%), and master's degree (17.4% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 29.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.080%), kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and 1st grade (97.9% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.11%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
No Schooling Completed
Good
2.1%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Average
98.0%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Average
97.9%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Average
97.7%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Average
97.5%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Fair
97.3%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Fair
96.9%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Average
96.0%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Average
95.7%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Good
95.0%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Good
94.0%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Excellent
92.9%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Good
91.5%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Good
89.5%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Excellent
86.6%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Excellent
66.9%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Exceptional
61.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Exceptional
50.0%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Exceptional
42.2%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Exceptional
17.4%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Exceptional
5.3%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Exceptional
2.2%
Tragic
1.6%

Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Immigrants from Brazil and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.3% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 28.7%), and disability age under 5 (1.4% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 22.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of vision disability (2.2% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.7%), disability age over 75 (46.3% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.1%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.6%).
Immigrants from Brazil vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricImmigrants from BrazilHmong
Disability
Exceptional
11.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Exceptional
10.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Exceptional
11.6%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Tragic
1.4%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Exceptional
6.3%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Exceptional
10.2%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
21.9%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Exceptional
46.3%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Poor
2.2%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Excellent
2.9%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Excellent
17.0%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Exceptional
5.6%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Exceptional
2.3%
Excellent
2.4%