Fijian vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Fijian
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Fijians
Hmong
3,167
SOCIAL INDEX
29.2/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
230th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Fijian Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 16,062,123 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Fijian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 1.000. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Fijians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.008% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Fijians corresponds to an increase of 8.4 Hmong.
Fijian vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 20.9%), median male earnings ($45,607 compared to $48,254, a difference of 5.8%), and householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($79,956 compared to $84,258, a difference of 5.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($56,768 compared to $56,339, a difference of 0.76%), median female earnings ($35,114 compared to $35,498, a difference of 1.1%), and householder income under 25 years ($50,132 compared to $49,364, a difference of 1.6%).
Income Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $36,690 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $87,387 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $74,205 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $40,193 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $45,607 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,114 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Tragic $50,132 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $79,956 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $85,187 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $56,768 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.9% | Tragic 27.7% |
Fijian vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (13.0% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 19.4%), married-couple family poverty (5.8% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 16.0%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (15.9% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 14.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single female poverty (23.1% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 0.030%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.0% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.19%), and single father poverty (15.7% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 1.3%).
Poverty Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 13.7% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 10.1% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 14.9% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Average 20.0% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 15.9% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 19.9% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 18.4% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 18.3% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 18.6% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.1% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Exceptional 15.7% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 31.6% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 5.8% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Good 10.7% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Excellent 11.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 13.0% | Excellent 10.9% |
Fijian vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.7% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 57.6%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.1% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 39.9%), and unemployment among women with children under 6 years (9.3% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 39.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.010%), unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.3% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 0.12%), and unemployment among seniors over 65 years (4.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 0.28%).
Unemployment Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
Unemployment | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Good 5.2% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Exceptional 4.7% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Exceptional 11.3% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Exceptional 16.3% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Exceptional 10.0% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Exceptional 6.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Exceptional 5.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 4.9% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Exceptional 3.8% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Exceptional 4.1% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Exceptional 3.9% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Exceptional 4.5% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Exceptional 4.2% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Average 8.7% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Exceptional 6.6% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Exceptional 5.1% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Fijian vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 4.4%), in labor force | age 45-54 (80.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.8%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (83.4% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 35-44 (82.9% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.44%), in labor force | age 20-64 (78.4% compared to 77.9%, a difference of 0.66%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (82.9% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.99%).
Labor Participation Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Poor 64.8% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.4% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Exceptional 40.4% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Exceptional 77.4% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.4% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 82.9% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 80.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
Fijian vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 26.8%), births to unmarried women (32.3% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 16.3%), and single mother households (7.2% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 12.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households with children (29.0% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.5%), family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.6%), and currently married (46.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.7%).
Family Structure Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.9% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 29.0% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Fair 46.1% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.36 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.2% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Fair 46.3% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Fair 32.3% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Fijian vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (7.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 12.1%), no vehicles in household (9.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 9.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.5% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 6.0%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Exceptional 9.5% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 90.5% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 57.6% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 22.2% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.8% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Fijian vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.1% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 39.2%), master's degree (10.3% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 30.2%), and professional degree (2.9% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 28.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.51%), kindergarten (97.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.52%), and 1st grade (97.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.52%).
Education Level Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 2.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 97.6% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 97.5% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 97.3% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 96.9% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 96.6% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 96.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 94.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 93.1% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 91.5% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 90.0% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 88.2% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 86.0% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 81.6% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 57.7% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.3% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 37.4% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 28.7% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 10.3% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 2.9% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.1% | Tragic 1.6% |
Fijian vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Fijian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in self-care disability (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 12.2%), disability age 5 to 17 (5.7% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 12.1%), and disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female disability (13.1% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.10%), disability (12.8% compared to 12.8%, a difference of 0.31%), and disability age 35 to 64 (13.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.62%).
Disability Metric | Fijian | Hmong |
Disability | Tragic 12.8% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Tragic 12.6% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Tragic 13.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Excellent 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Fair 5.7% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Tragic 7.2% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Tragic 13.2% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 27.0% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.4% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.7% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Tragic 6.8% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.7% | Excellent 2.4% |