Malaysian vs Hmong Community Comparison

COMPARE

Malaysian
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAmericanApacheArabArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianCosta RicanCreekCroatianCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHonduranHungarianIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLuxembourgerMacedonianMalaysianMalteseMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsagePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYaquiYugoslavianYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Hmong
Race
Ancestry
AfghanAfricanAlaska NativeAlaskan AthabascanAlbanianAleutAlsatianAmericanApacheArabArapahoArgentineanArmenianAssyrian/Chaldean/SyriacAustralianAustrianBahamianBangladeshiBarbadianBasqueBelgianBelizeanBermudanBhutaneseBlackfeetBolivianBrazilianBritishBritish West IndianBulgarianBurmeseCajunCambodianCanadianCape VerdeanCarpatho RusynCelticCentral AmericanCentral American IndianCherokeeCheyenneChickasawChileanChineseChippewaChoctawColombianColvilleComancheCosta RicanCreeCreekCroatianCrowCubanCypriotCzechCzechoslovakianDanishDelawareDominicanDutchDutch West IndianEastern EuropeanEcuadorianEgyptianEnglishEstonianEthiopianEuropeanFijianFilipinoFinnishFrenchFrench American IndianFrench CanadianGermanGerman RussianGhanaianGreekGuamanian/ChamorroGuatemalanGuyaneseHaitianHmongHonduranHopiHoumaHungarianIcelanderIndian (Asian)IndonesianInupiatIranianIraqiIrishIroquoisIsraeliItalianJamaicanJapaneseJordanianKenyanKiowaKoreanLaotianLatvianLebaneseLiberianLithuanianLumbeeLuxembourgerMacedonianMalteseMarshalleseMenomineeMexicanMexican American IndianMongolianMoroccanNative HawaiianNavajoNepaleseNew ZealanderNicaraguanNigerianNorthern EuropeanNorwegianOkinawanOsageOttawaPaiutePakistaniPalestinianPanamanianParaguayanPennsylvania GermanPeruvianPimaPolishPortuguesePotawatomiPuebloPuerto RicanPuget Sound SalishRomanianRussianSalvadoranSamoanScandinavianScotch-IrishScottishSeminoleSenegaleseSerbianShoshoneSierra LeoneanSiouxSlavicSlovakSloveneSomaliSouth AfricanSouth AmericanSouth American IndianSoviet UnionSpaniardSpanishSpanish AmericanSpanish American IndianSri LankanSubsaharan AfricanSudaneseSwedishSwissSyrianTaiwaneseThaiTlingit-HaidaTohono O'OdhamTonganTrinidadian and TobagonianTsimshianTurkishU.S. Virgin IslanderUgandanUkrainianUruguayanUteVenezuelanVietnameseWelshWest IndianYakamaYaquiYugoslavianYumanYup'ikZimbabwean
Immigration
NonimmigrantsImmigrantsAfghanistanAfricaAlbaniaArgentinaArmeniaAsiaAustraliaAustriaBahamasBangladeshBarbadosBelarusBelgiumBelizeBoliviaBosnia and HerzegovinaBrazilBulgariaBurma/MyanmarCabo VerdeCambodiaCameroonCanadaCaribbeanCentral AmericaChileChinaColombiaCongoCosta RicaCroatiaCubaCzechoslovakiaDenmarkDominicaDominican RepublicEastern AfricaEastern AsiaEastern EuropeEcuadorEgyptEl SalvadorEnglandEritreaEthiopiaEuropeFijiFranceGermanyGhanaGreeceGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasHong KongHungaryIndiaIndonesiaIranIraqIrelandIsraelItalyJamaicaJapanJordanKazakhstanKenyaKoreaKuwaitLaosLatin AmericaLatviaLebanonLiberiaLithuaniaMalaysiaMexicoMicronesiaMiddle AfricaMoldovaMoroccoNepalNetherlandsNicaraguaNigeriaNorth AmericaNorth MacedoniaNorthern AfricaNorthern EuropeNorwayOceaniaPakistanPanamaPeruPhilippinesPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSaudi ArabiaScotlandSenegalSerbiaSierra LeoneSingaporeSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth AmericaSouth Central AsiaSouth Eastern AsiaSouthern EuropeSpainSri LankaSt. Vincent and the GrenadinesSudanSwedenSwitzerlandSyriaTaiwanThailandTrinidad and TobagoTurkeyUgandaUkraineUruguayUzbekistanVenezuelaVietnamWest IndiesWestern AfricaWestern AsiaWestern EuropeYemenZaireZimbabweAzores
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Income
Poverty
Unemployment
Labor Participation
Family Structure
Vehicle Availability
Education Level
Disability

Social Comparison

Malaysians

Hmong

Fair
Average
3,136
SOCIAL INDEX
28.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
232nd/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK

Hmong Integration in Malaysian Communities

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 22,612,834 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Malaysian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.619. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Malaysians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.043% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Malaysians corresponds to an increase of 43.2 Hmong.
Malaysian Integration in Hmong Communities

Malaysian vs Hmong Income

When considering income, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (25.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 10.6%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($94,517 compared to $88,115, a difference of 7.3%), and median household income ($81,064 compared to $75,839, a difference of 6.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of per capita income ($39,194 compared to $38,120, a difference of 2.8%), householder income over 65 years ($58,244 compared to $56,339, a difference of 3.4%), and median earnings ($43,844 compared to $42,111, a difference of 4.1%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Income
Income MetricMalaysianHmong
Per Capita Income
Tragic
$39,194
Tragic
$38,120
Median Family Income
Tragic
$95,230
Tragic
$91,296
Median Household Income
Tragic
$81,064
Tragic
$75,839
Median Earnings
Tragic
$43,844
Tragic
$42,111
Median Male Earnings
Tragic
$50,772
Tragic
$48,254
Median Female Earnings
Tragic
$37,298
Tragic
$35,498
Householder Age | Under 25 years
Poor
$51,615
Tragic
$49,364
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years
Tragic
$88,291
Tragic
$84,258
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years
Tragic
$94,517
Tragic
$88,115
Householder Age | Over 65 years
Tragic
$58,244
Tragic
$56,339
Wage/Income Gap
Excellent
25.0%
Tragic
27.7%

Malaysian vs Hmong Poverty

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in receiving food stamps (12.7% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 16.6%), single male poverty (12.6% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 12.5%), and married-couple family poverty (5.4% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 7.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of child poverty under the age of 5 (18.4% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 0.66%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.9% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 0.94%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.8% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Poverty
Poverty MetricMalaysianHmong
Poverty
Tragic
13.1%
Poor
12.8%
Families
Poor
9.6%
Average
9.1%
Males
Tragic
12.0%
Poor
11.6%
Females
Tragic
14.3%
Fair
13.9%
Females 18 to 24 years
Good
19.9%
Average
20.0%
Females 25 to 34 years
Tragic
14.7%
Fair
13.9%
Children Under 5 years
Tragic
18.4%
Tragic
18.5%
Children Under 16 years
Tragic
17.5%
Poor
17.1%
Boys Under 16 years
Tragic
17.6%
Fair
16.6%
Girls Under 16 years
Tragic
17.8%
Poor
17.5%
Single Males
Good
12.6%
Tragic
14.2%
Single Females
Tragic
22.2%
Tragic
23.1%
Single Fathers
Exceptional
14.9%
Exceptional
15.9%
Single Mothers
Poor
29.7%
Tragic
31.2%
Married Couples
Fair
5.4%
Excellent
5.0%
Seniors Over 65 years
Good
10.8%
Exceptional
10.4%
Seniors Over 75 years
Excellent
11.8%
Good
12.0%
Receiving Food Stamps
Tragic
12.7%
Excellent
10.9%

Malaysian vs Hmong Unemployment

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 53.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.3%), and unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.7% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.6% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.6%), male unemployment (5.3% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 3.2%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.3%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Unemployment
Unemployment MetricMalaysianHmong
Unemployment
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
5.0%
Males
Fair
5.3%
Tragic
5.5%
Females
Average
5.3%
Exceptional
4.4%
Youth < 25
Excellent
11.4%
Exceptional
10.8%
Age | 16 to 19 years
Exceptional
17.0%
Exceptional
16.3%
Age | 20 to 24 years
Exceptional
9.8%
Exceptional
9.4%
Age | 25 to 29 years
Good
6.6%
Exceptional
5.7%
Age | 30 to 34 years
Average
5.5%
Exceptional
4.9%
Age | 35 to 44 years
Fair
4.7%
Tragic
5.0%
Age | 45 to 54 years
Average
4.5%
Exceptional
3.7%
Age | 55 to 59 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Tragic
5.7%
Age | 60 to 64 years
Exceptional
4.7%
Exceptional
4.0%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Exceptional
5.2%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 65
Exceptional
5.1%
Exceptional
4.2%
Seniors > 75
Poor
8.9%
Tragic
13.7%
Women w/ Children < 6
Fair
7.7%
Exceptional
6.7%
Women w/ Children 6 to 17
Exceptional
8.6%
Exceptional
8.7%
Women w/ Children < 18
Fair
5.5%
Exceptional
4.5%

Malaysian vs Hmong Labor Participation

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age > 16 (66.1% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 3.2%), in labor force | age 16-19 (39.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 2.6%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.1% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 2.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 45-54 (82.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.38%), in labor force | age 20-24 (77.2% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.91%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (84.6% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.1%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Labor Participation
Labor Participation MetricMalaysianHmong
In Labor Force | Age > 16
Exceptional
66.1%
Tragic
64.1%
In Labor Force | Age 20-64
Fair
79.5%
Tragic
77.9%
In Labor Force | Age 16-19
Exceptional
39.7%
Exceptional
38.7%
In Labor Force | Age 20-24
Exceptional
77.2%
Exceptional
76.5%
In Labor Force | Age 25-29
Average
84.6%
Tragic
83.7%
In Labor Force | Age 30-34
Tragic
84.1%
Tragic
82.4%
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
Tragic
83.8%
Tragic
82.6%
In Labor Force | Age 45-54
Tragic
82.0%
Tragic
81.7%

Malaysian vs Hmong Family Structure

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.9% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.1%), single father households (2.7% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 15.3%), and single mother households (7.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 14.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of divorced or separated (12.4% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 0.55%), married-couple households (46.3% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 1.4%), and family households (65.9% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.5%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Family Structure
Family Structure MetricMalaysianHmong
Family Households
Exceptional
65.9%
Exceptional
64.9%
Family Households with Children
Exceptional
29.8%
Exceptional
28.6%
Married-couple Households
Average
46.3%
Good
47.0%
Average Family Size
Exceptional
3.31
Fair
3.21
Single Father Households
Tragic
2.7%
Fair
2.4%
Single Mother Households
Tragic
7.3%
Fair
6.4%
Currently Married
Poor
45.9%
Good
47.1%
Divorced or Separated
Tragic
12.4%
Tragic
12.3%
Births to Unmarried Women
Tragic
33.9%
Exceptional
27.7%

Malaysian vs Hmong Vehicle Availability

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 34.5%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.7% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 9.8%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (92.3% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 3.0%), 2 or more vehicles in household (59.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 3.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (22.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 7.8%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
Vehicle Availability MetricMalaysianHmong
No Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Average
10.4%
1+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
92.3%
Average
89.6%
2+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
59.8%
Exceptional
57.8%
3+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
22.6%
Exceptional
21.0%
4+ Vehicles Available
Exceptional
7.7%
Exceptional
7.0%

Malaysian vs Hmong Education Level

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (2.8% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 42.1%), master's degree (12.0% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 11.3%), and professional degree (3.4% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 10.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (97.3% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.82%), kindergarten (97.2% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.84%), and 1st grade (97.2% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.85%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Education Level
Education Level MetricMalaysianHmong
No Schooling Completed
Tragic
2.8%
Excellent
1.9%
Nursery School
Tragic
97.3%
Good
98.1%
Kindergarten
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.1%
1st Grade
Tragic
97.2%
Good
98.0%
2nd Grade
Tragic
97.1%
Good
98.0%
3rd Grade
Tragic
97.0%
Excellent
97.9%
4th Grade
Tragic
96.7%
Excellent
97.7%
5th Grade
Tragic
96.5%
Exceptional
97.6%
6th Grade
Tragic
96.2%
Exceptional
97.4%
7th Grade
Tragic
94.8%
Exceptional
96.4%
8th Grade
Tragic
94.5%
Excellent
96.1%
9th Grade
Tragic
93.5%
Excellent
95.2%
10th Grade
Tragic
92.2%
Excellent
94.1%
11th Grade
Tragic
90.8%
Good
92.8%
12th Grade, No Diploma
Tragic
89.2%
Average
91.3%
High School Diploma
Tragic
87.0%
Average
89.1%
GED/Equivalency
Tragic
83.3%
Poor
84.9%
College, Under 1 year
Tragic
62.2%
Tragic
63.5%
College, 1 year or more
Tragic
55.6%
Tragic
57.2%
Associate's Degree
Tragic
41.6%
Tragic
43.4%
Bachelor's Degree
Tragic
32.9%
Tragic
34.8%
Master's Degree
Tragic
12.0%
Tragic
13.4%
Professional Degree
Tragic
3.4%
Tragic
3.7%
Doctorate Degree
Tragic
1.5%
Tragic
1.6%

Malaysian vs Hmong Disability

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Malaysian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.3% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 14.3%), disability age 18 to 34 (7.2% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 12.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 8.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.4% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 1.0%), vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.5%), and disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.7%).
Malaysian vs Hmong Disability
Disability MetricMalaysianHmong
Disability
Tragic
12.2%
Tragic
12.8%
Males
Tragic
11.8%
Tragic
12.5%
Females
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | Under 5 years
Poor
1.3%
Exceptional
1.1%
Age | 5 to 17 years
Tragic
5.8%
Tragic
6.3%
Age | 18 to 34 years
Tragic
7.2%
Tragic
8.1%
Age | 35 to 64 years
Tragic
12.5%
Tragic
13.1%
Age | 65 to 74 years
Tragic
25.4%
Tragic
25.7%
Age | Over 75 years
Tragic
49.0%
Tragic
48.2%
Vision
Tragic
2.3%
Tragic
2.3%
Hearing
Tragic
3.2%
Tragic
3.4%
Cognitive
Tragic
17.9%
Tragic
18.4%
Ambulatory
Fair
6.2%
Tragic
6.6%
Self-Care
Tragic
2.5%
Excellent
2.4%