Portuguese vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,321,498 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Portuguese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.120. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Portuguese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.007% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Portuguese corresponds to an increase of 6.9 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($105,309 compared to $88,115, a difference of 19.5%), householder income ages 25 - 44 years ($99,429 compared to $84,258, a difference of 18.0%), and median male earnings ($56,663 compared to $48,254, a difference of 17.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (27.4% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.2%), householder income over 65 years ($61,440 compared to $56,339, a difference of 9.0%), and householder income under 25 years ($54,436 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty among girls under 16 (15.3% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 14.0%), child poverty under the age of 16 (15.1% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 13.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (17.8% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 12.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (12.1% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 0.89%), seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 1.2%), and female poverty among 25-34 year olds (13.6% compared to 13.9%, a difference of 2.0%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.7% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 36.6%), unemployment among seniors over 65 years (5.6% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 32.4%), and unemployment among seniors over 75 years (10.4% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.0%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.0%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.4% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 6.9%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (40.0% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 3.4%), in labor force | age 35-44 (84.3% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (84.0% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 1.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 20-24 (76.4% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 0.13%), in labor force | age > 16 (64.4% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 0.46%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (82.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.62%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (33.8% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 21.9%), single father households (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.4%), and family households with children (27.6% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 3.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single mother households (6.4% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 0.020%), currently married (47.3% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 0.60%), and average family size (3.19 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.65%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (8.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 20.9%), 4 or more vehicles in household (7.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 6.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (58.6% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 1.4%), 1 or more vehicles in household (91.6% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 2.1%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (21.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (1.8% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 11.5%), professional degree (4.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 8.5%), and no schooling completed (2.1% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 8.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of college, 1 year or more (57.2% compared to 57.2%, a difference of 0.0%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and kindergarten (97.9% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.12%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Portuguese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age under 5 (1.6% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 42.8%), disability age 35 to 64 (11.9% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 10.0%), and self-care disability (2.6% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 9.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of hearing disability (3.5% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 0.83%), female disability (13.0% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 0.97%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 1.1%).