Soviet Union vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 19,745,377 people shows a perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Soviet Union communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.985. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Soviet Union within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.550% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Soviet Union corresponds to an increase of 549.5 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($54,202 compared to $38,120, a difference of 42.2%), median male earnings ($63,382 compared to $48,254, a difference of 31.4%), and median female earnings ($46,556 compared to $35,498, a difference of 31.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of householder income over 65 years ($62,848 compared to $56,339, a difference of 11.6%), householder income under 25 years ($55,340 compared to $49,364, a difference of 12.1%), and wage/income gap (24.2% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 14.4%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (14.7% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 26.3%), single male poverty (11.5% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 23.8%), and seniors poverty over the age of 75 (14.5% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 20.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of receiving food stamps (11.1% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 1.6%), married-couple family poverty (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 2.1%), and female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.8%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (6.6% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 106.5%), unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (5.4% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 34.7%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 27.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 1.1%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (16.8% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 3.0%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (31.4% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 23.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (72.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 5.9%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (65.0% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.5%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.0% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 1.6%), and in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single father households (1.8% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 32.0%), single mother households (5.1% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 24.7%), and family households with children (24.8% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 15.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of currently married (46.2% compared to 47.1%, a difference of 1.9%), average family size (3.11 compared to 3.21, a difference of 3.0%), and married-couple households (44.6% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 5.2%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (17.4% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 68.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (4.4% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 57.6%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 48.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (82.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 8.4%), 2 or more vehicles in household (45.7% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 26.4%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (14.2% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 48.0%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.6% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 75.3%), doctorate degree (2.5% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 58.0%), and master's degree (20.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 53.2%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 7th grade (96.4% compared to 96.4%, a difference of 0.010%), nursery school (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.020%), and kindergarten (98.0% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.030%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Soviet Union and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 42.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (5.7% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 40.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.0% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 27.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.5% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 4.2%), disability age over 75 (46.2% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 4.4%), and female disability (11.7% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 11.5%).