Russian vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,634,879 people shows a near-perfect positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Russian communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.925. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Russians within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.084% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Russians corresponds to an increase of 83.7 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in per capita income ($53,154 compared to $38,120, a difference of 39.4%), median male earnings ($63,939 compared to $48,254, a difference of 32.5%), and householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($116,328 compared to $88,115, a difference of 32.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,389 compared to $49,364, a difference of 10.2%), and householder income over 65 years ($67,626 compared to $56,339, a difference of 20.0%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 16 (13.5% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 26.5%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.9% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 26.1%), and child poverty under the age of 5 (14.8% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 25.7%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds (19.5% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 2.7%), seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.6% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.8%), and single father poverty (16.4% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 3.6%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.9% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 54.6%), unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.4% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 28.2%), and unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years (4.9% compared to 4.0%, a difference of 22.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (5.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.080%), unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (8.8% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 1.2%), and unemployment among youth under 25 years (11.6% compared to 10.8%, a difference of 6.8%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (36.7% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 5.5%), in labor force | age 30-34 (85.5% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.7%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (85.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age > 16 (64.9% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 1.2%), in labor force | age 25-29 (85.3% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.9%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (83.4% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.1%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.8%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 18.1%), and family households with children (26.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 7.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of births to unmarried women (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.0%), family households (63.4% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 2.4%), and married-couple households (48.2% compared to 47.0%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 4 or more vehicles in household (6.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 16.7%), no vehicles in household (11.6% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 11.9%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 1 or more vehicles in household (88.7% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 1.1%), 2 or more vehicles in household (54.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 5.5%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (18.8% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 11.4%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in professional degree (6.3% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 69.1%), doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 62.5%), and master's degree (19.5% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 45.9%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of kindergarten (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.32%), 1st grade (98.3% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.33%), and nursery school (98.4% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.34%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Russian and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (10.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 29.1%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.5% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 22.9%), and disability age 65 to 74 (21.2% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 21.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of self-care disability (2.4% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 0.21%), disability age over 75 (45.5% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.9%), and hearing disability (3.2% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 8.0%).