Guatemalan vs Hmong Community Comparison
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Hmong
Social Comparison
Social Comparison
Guatemalans
Hmong
1,497
SOCIAL INDEX
12.5/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
305th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
4,737
SOCIAL INDEX
44.9/ 100
SOCIAL RATING
196th/ 347
SOCIAL RANK
Hmong Integration in Guatemalan Communities
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,190,176 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Guatemalan communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.177. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Guatemalans within a typical geography, there is a decrease of 0.008% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Guatemalans corresponds to a decrease of 7.9 Hmong.
Guatemalan vs Hmong Income
When considering income, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in wage/income gap (22.6% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 22.4%), householder income under 25 years ($51,525 compared to $49,364, a difference of 4.4%), and median family income ($88,295 compared to $91,296, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of median household income ($75,961 compared to $75,839, a difference of 0.16%), householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($87,705 compared to $88,115, a difference of 0.47%), and median female earnings ($35,695 compared to $35,498, a difference of 0.56%).
Income Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
Per Capita Income | Tragic $37,766 | Tragic $38,120 |
Median Family Income | Tragic $88,295 | Tragic $91,296 |
Median Household Income | Tragic $75,961 | Tragic $75,839 |
Median Earnings | Tragic $41,205 | Tragic $42,111 |
Median Male Earnings | Tragic $46,736 | Tragic $48,254 |
Median Female Earnings | Tragic $35,695 | Tragic $35,498 |
Householder Age | Under 25 years | Poor $51,525 | Tragic $49,364 |
Householder Age | 25 - 44 years | Tragic $82,331 | Tragic $84,258 |
Householder Age | 45 - 64 years | Tragic $87,705 | Tragic $88,115 |
Householder Age | Over 65 years | Tragic $54,526 | Tragic $56,339 |
Wage/Income Gap | Exceptional 22.6% | Tragic 27.7% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Poverty
When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in married-couple family poverty (7.0% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 41.4%), receiving food stamps (14.4% compared to 10.9%, a difference of 32.2%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (13.5% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 30.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of single male poverty (13.8% compared to 14.2%, a difference of 3.1%), female poverty among 18-24 year olds (20.7% compared to 20.0%, a difference of 3.3%), and single female poverty (23.8% compared to 23.1%, a difference of 3.4%).
Poverty Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
Poverty | Tragic 15.3% | Poor 12.8% |
Families | Tragic 11.7% | Average 9.1% |
Males | Tragic 13.8% | Poor 11.6% |
Females | Tragic 16.7% | Fair 13.9% |
Females 18 to 24 years | Tragic 20.7% | Average 20.0% |
Females 25 to 34 years | Tragic 16.4% | Fair 13.9% |
Children Under 5 years | Tragic 21.6% | Tragic 18.5% |
Children Under 16 years | Tragic 21.2% | Poor 17.1% |
Boys Under 16 years | Tragic 21.1% | Fair 16.6% |
Girls Under 16 years | Tragic 21.4% | Poor 17.5% |
Single Males | Tragic 13.8% | Tragic 14.2% |
Single Females | Tragic 23.8% | Tragic 23.1% |
Single Fathers | Poor 16.6% | Exceptional 15.9% |
Single Mothers | Tragic 32.9% | Tragic 31.2% |
Married Couples | Tragic 7.0% | Excellent 5.0% |
Seniors Over 65 years | Tragic 13.5% | Exceptional 10.4% |
Seniors Over 75 years | Tragic 14.8% | Good 12.0% |
Receiving Food Stamps | Tragic 14.4% | Excellent 10.9% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Unemployment
When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.8% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 56.1%), unemployment among women with children under 18 years (6.3% compared to 4.5%, a difference of 39.8%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.8% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 38.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of male unemployment (5.6% compared to 5.5%, a difference of 2.6%), unemployment among ages 35 to 44 years (5.1% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 3.5%), and unemployment among women with children ages 6 to 17 years (9.3% compared to 8.7%, a difference of 7.5%).
Unemployment Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
Unemployment | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 5.0% |
Males | Tragic 5.6% | Tragic 5.5% |
Females | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.4% |
Youth < 25 | Tragic 12.1% | Exceptional 10.8% |
Age | 16 to 19 years | Tragic 18.6% | Exceptional 16.3% |
Age | 20 to 24 years | Poor 10.5% | Exceptional 9.4% |
Age | 25 to 29 years | Tragic 7.1% | Exceptional 5.7% |
Age | 30 to 34 years | Tragic 6.0% | Exceptional 4.9% |
Age | 35 to 44 years | Tragic 5.1% | Tragic 5.0% |
Age | 45 to 54 years | Tragic 4.9% | Exceptional 3.7% |
Age | 55 to 59 years | Tragic 5.3% | Tragic 5.7% |
Age | 60 to 64 years | Tragic 5.2% | Exceptional 4.0% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 5.8% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 65 | Tragic 5.6% | Exceptional 4.2% |
Seniors > 75 | Fair 8.8% | Tragic 13.7% |
Women w/ Children < 6 | Tragic 8.7% | Exceptional 6.7% |
Women w/ Children 6 to 17 | Tragic 9.3% | Exceptional 8.7% |
Women w/ Children < 18 | Tragic 6.3% | Exceptional 4.5% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Labor Participation
When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (35.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 9.1%), in labor force | age > 16 (65.6% compared to 64.1%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 20-24 (75.3% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (83.7% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 0.040%), in labor force | age 35-44 (83.0% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 0.50%), and in labor force | age 45-54 (81.2% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 0.65%).
Labor Participation Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
In Labor Force | Age > 16 | Exceptional 65.6% | Tragic 64.1% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-64 | Tragic 78.7% | Tragic 77.9% |
In Labor Force | Age 16-19 | Tragic 35.5% | Exceptional 38.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 20-24 | Good 75.3% | Exceptional 76.5% |
In Labor Force | Age 25-29 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 83.7% |
In Labor Force | Age 30-34 | Tragic 83.7% | Tragic 82.4% |
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 | Tragic 83.0% | Tragic 82.6% |
In Labor Force | Age 45-54 | Tragic 81.2% | Tragic 81.7% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Family Structure
When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in births to unmarried women (37.1% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 33.8%), single father households (3.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 25.2%), and single mother households (7.7% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.1%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of family households (65.2% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 0.53%), family households with children (28.9% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 1.1%), and divorced or separated (12.2% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 1.1%).
Family Structure Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
Family Households | Exceptional 65.2% | Exceptional 64.9% |
Family Households with Children | Exceptional 28.9% | Exceptional 28.6% |
Married-couple Households | Tragic 43.3% | Good 47.0% |
Average Family Size | Exceptional 3.40 | Fair 3.21 |
Single Father Households | Tragic 3.0% | Fair 2.4% |
Single Mother Households | Tragic 7.7% | Fair 6.4% |
Currently Married | Tragic 42.9% | Good 47.1% |
Divorced or Separated | Fair 12.2% | Tragic 12.3% |
Births to Unmarried Women | Tragic 37.1% | Exceptional 27.7% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Vehicle Availability
When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in 2 or more vehicles in household (54.1% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 6.8%), no vehicles in household (11.0% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.5%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 4 or more vehicles in household (7.0% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 0.35%), 1 or more vehicles in household (89.2% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.53%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.1% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 4.5%).
Vehicle Availability Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
No Vehicles Available | Poor 11.0% | Average 10.4% |
1+ Vehicles Available | Poor 89.2% | Average 89.6% |
2+ Vehicles Available | Tragic 54.1% | Exceptional 57.8% |
3+ Vehicles Available | Excellent 20.1% | Exceptional 21.0% |
4+ Vehicles Available | Exceptional 7.0% | Exceptional 7.0% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Education Level
When considering education level, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no schooling completed (3.5% compared to 1.9%, a difference of 77.6%), master's degree (11.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 14.1%), and associate's degree (38.5% compared to 43.4%, a difference of 12.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of nursery school (96.6% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.5%), kindergarten (96.5% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 1.6%), and 1st grade (96.5% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 1.6%).
Education Level Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
No Schooling Completed | Tragic 3.5% | Excellent 1.9% |
Nursery School | Tragic 96.6% | Good 98.1% |
Kindergarten | Tragic 96.5% | Good 98.1% |
1st Grade | Tragic 96.5% | Good 98.0% |
2nd Grade | Tragic 96.3% | Good 98.0% |
3rd Grade | Tragic 96.0% | Excellent 97.9% |
4th Grade | Tragic 95.3% | Excellent 97.7% |
5th Grade | Tragic 94.8% | Exceptional 97.6% |
6th Grade | Tragic 94.2% | Exceptional 97.4% |
7th Grade | Tragic 91.7% | Exceptional 96.4% |
8th Grade | Tragic 91.1% | Excellent 96.1% |
9th Grade | Tragic 89.9% | Excellent 95.2% |
10th Grade | Tragic 87.9% | Excellent 94.1% |
11th Grade | Tragic 86.4% | Good 92.8% |
12th Grade, No Diploma | Tragic 84.6% | Average 91.3% |
High School Diploma | Tragic 82.0% | Average 89.1% |
GED/Equivalency | Tragic 78.5% | Poor 84.9% |
College, Under 1 year | Tragic 56.8% | Tragic 63.5% |
College, 1 year or more | Tragic 51.2% | Tragic 57.2% |
Associate's Degree | Tragic 38.5% | Tragic 43.4% |
Bachelor's Degree | Tragic 31.0% | Tragic 34.8% |
Master's Degree | Tragic 11.7% | Tragic 13.4% |
Professional Degree | Tragic 3.5% | Tragic 3.7% |
Doctorate Degree | Tragic 1.4% | Tragic 1.6% |
Guatemalan vs Hmong Disability
When considering disability, the most significant differences between Guatemalan and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 18 to 34 (6.4% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 26.8%), hearing disability (2.8% compared to 3.4%, a difference of 22.0%), and disability age 5 to 17 (5.5% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 15.3%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age 65 to 74 (25.5% compared to 25.7%, a difference of 0.45%), disability age over 75 (49.0% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 1.7%), and vision disability (2.3% compared to 2.3%, a difference of 2.4%).
Disability Metric | Guatemalan | Hmong |
Disability | Good 11.6% | Tragic 12.8% |
Males | Good 11.1% | Tragic 12.5% |
Females | Good 12.1% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | Under 5 years | Good 1.2% | Exceptional 1.1% |
Age | 5 to 17 years | Excellent 5.5% | Tragic 6.3% |
Age | 18 to 34 years | Excellent 6.4% | Tragic 8.1% |
Age | 35 to 64 years | Poor 11.7% | Tragic 13.1% |
Age | 65 to 74 years | Tragic 25.5% | Tragic 25.7% |
Age | Over 75 years | Tragic 49.0% | Tragic 48.2% |
Vision | Tragic 2.3% | Tragic 2.3% |
Hearing | Exceptional 2.8% | Tragic 3.4% |
Cognitive | Tragic 17.8% | Tragic 18.4% |
Ambulatory | Fair 6.2% | Tragic 6.6% |
Self-Care | Tragic 2.6% | Excellent 2.4% |