Burmese vs Hmong Community Comparison

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 24,607,505 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Hmong within Burmese communities in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.260. On average, for every 1% (one percent) increase in Burmese within a typical geography, there is an increase of 0.003% in Hmong. To illustrate, in a geography comprising of 100,000 individuals, a rise of 1,000 Burmese corresponds to an increase of 3.4 Hmong.

When considering income, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in householder income ages 45 - 64 years ($121,444 compared to $88,115, a difference of 37.8%), per capita income ($52,005 compared to $38,120, a difference of 36.4%), and median household income ($103,145 compared to $75,839, a difference of 36.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of wage/income gap (28.0% compared to 27.7%, a difference of 1.1%), householder income under 25 years ($54,800 compared to $49,364, a difference of 11.0%), and householder income over 65 years ($71,139 compared to $56,339, a difference of 26.3%).

When considering poverty, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in child poverty under the age of 5 (13.2% compared to 18.5%, a difference of 40.2%), child poverty among girls under 16 (13.0% compared to 17.5%, a difference of 34.3%), and child poverty under the age of 16 (12.8% compared to 17.1%, a difference of 33.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of seniors poverty over the age of 75 (11.7% compared to 12.0%, a difference of 2.5%), single father poverty (15.5% compared to 15.9%, a difference of 2.6%), and seniors poverty over the age of 65 (10.1% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 3.2%).

When considering unemployment, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in unemployment among seniors over 75 years (8.2% compared to 13.7%, a difference of 67.9%), unemployment among ages 55 to 59 years (4.5% compared to 5.7%, a difference of 25.5%), and unemployment among ages 65 to 74 years (5.2% compared to 4.2%, a difference of 24.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of unemployment (4.9% compared to 5.0%, a difference of 0.62%), unemployment among women with children under 6 years (6.5% compared to 6.7%, a difference of 2.7%), and unemployment among ages 16 to 19 years (17.0% compared to 16.3%, a difference of 4.1%).

When considering labor participation, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in in labor force | age 16-19 (34.5% compared to 38.7%, a difference of 12.3%), in labor force | age 20-24 (73.6% compared to 76.5%, a difference of 4.0%), and in labor force | age 30-34 (85.3% compared to 82.4%, a difference of 3.4%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of in labor force | age 25-29 (85.1% compared to 83.7%, a difference of 1.7%), in labor force | age 45-54 (83.6% compared to 81.7%, a difference of 2.3%), and in labor force | age 35-44 (84.7% compared to 82.6%, a difference of 2.6%).

When considering family structure, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in single mother households (5.3% compared to 6.4%, a difference of 20.7%), single father households (2.0% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 16.5%), and divorced or separated (10.7% compared to 12.3%, a difference of 14.8%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of average family size (3.22 compared to 3.21, a difference of 0.25%), family households with children (28.5% compared to 28.6%, a difference of 0.34%), and family households (65.7% compared to 64.9%, a difference of 1.3%).

When considering vehicle availability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in no vehicles in household (9.7% compared to 10.4%, a difference of 7.1%), 4 or more vehicles in household (6.8% compared to 7.0%, a difference of 2.2%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 2 or more vehicles in household (57.8% compared to 57.8%, a difference of 0.030%), 1 or more vehicles in household (90.4% compared to 89.6%, a difference of 0.88%), and 3 or more vehicles in household (20.6% compared to 21.0%, a difference of 1.6%).

When considering education level, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in doctorate degree (2.6% compared to 1.6%, a difference of 67.8%), professional degree (6.1% compared to 3.7%, a difference of 64.0%), and master's degree (19.7% compared to 13.4%, a difference of 47.0%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of 3rd grade (97.9% compared to 97.9%, a difference of 0.0%), kindergarten (98.1% compared to 98.1%, a difference of 0.010%), and 1st grade (98.0% compared to 98.0%, a difference of 0.010%).

When considering disability, the most significant differences between Burmese and Hmong communities in the United States are seen in disability age 35 to 64 (9.2% compared to 13.1%, a difference of 42.7%), disability age 18 to 34 (6.0% compared to 8.1%, a difference of 34.4%), and disability age 5 to 17 (4.8% compared to 6.3%, a difference of 32.6%). Conversely, both communities are more comparable in terms of disability age under 5 (1.1% compared to 1.1%, a difference of 0.72%), disability age over 75 (45.9% compared to 48.2%, a difference of 5.0%), and self-care disability (2.3% compared to 2.4%, a difference of 6.3%).